• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It was defamation the entire time just because somebody made it an app rather than a Facebook group doesn’t make any difference. It was always a crap thing to do.

    Of course Tea took it to an entirely new level of stupid.

    • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      It was potentially defamation when it was just women…talking to one another, too. This seems like a pretty solid case of men looking at something women do to protect each other, and saying “…but what about the men who could be negatively affected in some cases?” I also think the tone in which this is being discussed is pretty revealing about Lemmy’s demographics.

      • discount_door_garlic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        the app is called TEA - it is a gossip vector masquerading as a safety mechanism, and people are making all sorts of claims about innocent people they had a bad date about, including their full name, location, workplace, pictures of their face - and accusing them baselessly in some (or most) instances of violent crimes.

        If you can’t see how not only that wouldnt make women safer, but instead is a black mirror episode - there’s something wrong.

        People against this app aren’t against women’s safety, and they dont necessarily believe our current systems and protection are adequate - but getting lynched by half a city because of a jaded ex is not a solution and is a crime of its own.

        I mean half the posts on similar Facebook groups complain about the men being “narcissists” yeah its a shitty personality trait but thats clearly not a fucking safety issue, its about gossiping and doxxing people.