First of all, I’d like to apologize for contributing to the constant stream/flow of posts in which the main theme/idea/motive is to find a suitable distro for the OPoster. I wish we’d have a dedicated community that’s active/large to the extent we’d be able to delegate/contain these convos to their designated places, but alas…

With that out of the way, we can get to the actual meat. So, for two weeks, I’ve been reading a ton about different distros. And while I’m still primarily overwhelmed by the amount of choice, I think I’ve finally got somewhat of an idea.

Requirements:

  • Software-wise, the only thing I’m worried about is Davinci Resolve. It should work, but it seems to be hit or miss. The distro I wish to use should handle this gracefully.
  • I’m a huge snob for security and privacy. As I’m kinda worried that desktop Linux’ security isn’t on par with M$ or macOS, I wish to use as secure of a system as possible to (somewhat) compensate for that.

I like to follow ‘authorities’ whenever I’m overwhelmed. As I’ve known them since their PrivacyTools-days, it was easy for me to designate Privacy Guides as such. Hence, I’ve come to appreciate its recommendations. But, I believe the tailor-made consensus by this communities’ experts is at least equally important.

That’s where I’m coming from, let’s head over to the questions:

  • Are PrivacyGuides’ recommendations actually good in the first place?

  • From what I can tell, the subset of security-focused distros are (at least potentially) my end-game. But, from what I could gather, they’re not sensible picks for a newb. Is this correct?

  • As for what remains, I got the following assumptions (please correct me if I’m wrong*):

    • The anonymity-focused distros don’t seem well-suited for general use.
    • Hardening Arch or NixOS to the extent we find within the offerings of Fedora or openSUSE isn’t trivial.
    • Fedora’s Atomic Desktops offer something tangibly superior security-wise over what we find for traditional Fedora and openSUSE at the expense of convenience.

    As such, am I correct to assume that Fedora Atomic Desktops are best for me? Would you happen to know if it plays nicely with Davinci Resolve?

  • Are there any other distros worth mentioning within the context? If so, which ones and why?

  • Any gotchas or otherwise I should be aware of?

Thanks in advance for your input!

  • stuner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The easiest distros to run Resolve would probably be Rocky Linux 8, Alma Linux 8 (both are based on RHEL 8). Instead of the EOL Rocky/Alma 8.6, you should use release 8.10 (8.6 would update to 8.10 anyway). However, while still currently “supported”, these are still shipping (mostly) 6-year-old (!) packages. Also, only a small number of packages is actively supported by Red Hat. IMO, this implies that these distros offer a lower level of security. The most critical parts (browser, kernel) are still well-supported, so the difference is probably not too large for most regular users. However, you may also struggle to run some other software (although Flatpaks are available). It’s unfortunate that Resolve only supports an ancient version of Rocky (Rocky 10 is now out)…

    • 734Y4ch_7M3_7r0@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Oh wow. Thank you so much for that information! Much appreciated!

      Hmm…, so I suppose both Rocky Linux and Alma Linux are out of consideration then. Which is definitely a pity considering Davinci Resolve. What would you suggest instead?