• ronigami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you’re going by capitalist purism like Milton Friedman we’re nothing even close to that.

          • ronigami@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago
            1. They can be more or less free. You aim for more and don’t achieve perfect freedom but it can be close.
            2. This is why bodies like the FTC are supposed to exist.
            3. Fuck you
              • ronigami@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago
                1. If they’re all in different positions then they aren’t all antithetical.
                2. Free and fragmented. When you let things get too consolidated and centralized they stop being free.
                • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  But the point of capitalism, a system where capital (ownership) is valued is centralizing. So if you let it do the entire central point of the thing it’s anti-democratic

                  You can’t create strong values and pervasive systemic imperatives to behave a certain way and then jyst arbitrarily switch on a dime. Thats not how human behavior or physics or literally anything besides fuvking magic works. That system will always crush the rules made to bind it, thats its nature, thats how it was designed and what i have been told its greatest virtue is. Expecting you can make it behave differently without a power differential so spectacular that this system cannot be a substantial factor in anything (like, a step or two on the kardashev scale) is clown shit, and nobody who thinks like that should be considered competent to operate heavy machinery (like cars) or consent to sex.

                  • ronigami@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    This is like saying cars are designed to go fast, people driving them want to go fast, the entire purpose of them is to go fast. Adding speed limits defeats their entire purpose.

                    If you believe systems always destroy themselves there is no hope for you because that isn’t the point. You will die someday, that isn’t the point. The point is to live.