• JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      So they’d rather have a president who would support a genocide even more. Seems like a great decision.

      Also, there were other issues at play in this election. Even Bernie Sanders said so

      • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lol no “they’d” rather have a president who doesn’t materially support genocide, but seems like that wasn’t something people were allowed to vote for.

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          In other words they didn’t want to chose the lesser evil so they were fine with either option

          Amazing decision.

          • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Or, it could mean they weren’t fine with either option? “We’re not quite as evil as the other guy” isn’t the campaign slogan you seem to think it is.