Not particularly pleased about the decision when OpenVPN is the most supported protocol.

Meanwhile their competitor IVPN even does IPsec.

  • stupid_asshole69 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yes, that was the technique used by interpol to get mullvad to comply with a csam investigation. The terms were ”give us user information or drop port forwarding unless you wanna remain on a global blacklist” and mullvad chose to drop port forwarding.

      • stupid_asshole69 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Not in the slightest. Web accessibility using mullvad before and since has tracked the ongoing trend of websites blocking vpn services and almost all their endpoint ips have rolled over since then.

        In my own experience, sites that weren’t blocking mullvad before and were blocking during the csam investigation aren’t blocking now. That’s because the blocking was mostly happening at the cdn level.

        They didn’t remain on the blocklist but the web is becoming hostile to vpn ips. One way around this is by using a web proxy defined in your browsers settings.