• Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    Intel remained the biggest spender at $16.55 billion last year, but its growth rate was just 3.1 percent, far below Samsung’s.

    Intel, the only U.S. chipmaker that designs and manufactures semiconductors in-house, is believed to have focused its spending on boosting yields of its 18A process (1.8 nanometers) in its foundry. Despite the push, Intel reported an $18.8 billion loss last year.

    Nvidia ranked No. 2 in total R&D spending with $12.5 billion last year, a 47 percent jump from 2023.

    It’s crazy that Intel spends significantly more than Nvidia on R&D and yet they’ve been lagging on delivery for many years now.

    • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I figured it is because GPUs are less complex and have larger improvement impact per dollar than the x86 CPU.

      Is this the case or is fabrication just fabrication?

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        I suspect Nvidia benefits from not having fabs, a like for like comparison would include some percentage of TSMC’s R&D spend.