ardi60@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoGoogle's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for userswww.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square260fedilinkarrow-up1534arrow-down112 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1522arrow-down1external-linkGoogle's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for userswww.androidauthority.comardi60@reddthat.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square260fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareEggyhead@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 days agoThey never specified who’s security…
minus-squareespentan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoTheir revenue probably felt very threatened.
minus-squareSCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 days agoWhose* Who’s = who + is Whose = an indication of possession
minus-squareEggyhead@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 hours agoThe question is still valid, even if the meaning changes.
minus-squarek0e3@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoI will always remember this grammar rule thanks to the show “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” because I would see that title every morning before school.
They never specified who’s security…
Their revenue probably felt very threatened.
Whose*
Who’s = who + is
Whose = an indication of possession
The question is still valid, even if the meaning changes.
I will always remember this grammar rule thanks to the show “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” because I would see that title every morning before school.