• hisao@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    senior developers were twice as likely to put AI-generated code into production compared to junior developers, saying that the technology helped them work faster

    Perhaps senior devs are more likely to use more granular, step-by-step, controlled prompting. Asking it do write specific functions in specific ways and following specific approaches and conventions instead of just “do me an app, robot bro”.

    • Bababasti@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s actually how I am using AI for my work (web dev, pls don’t hate me). If I am stuck or have some tiny function missing for a task I ask AI, check their output - if it’s garbage I continue on my own again or if it’s usable I review the output and continue from there. Also, I think AI can be neat for „rubberducking“ when I am debugging some stupid shit and point me in directions I haven’t looked before.

      • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Similar to how I have found success with it. Is it revolutionary? No, not at all. But it’s a variable sized (big for some use and nonexistent for other use) incremental tool that requires a new skill set to use effectively.

        Mix in all of the hype and its easy to see why people are confused and why some get different results.