I mean i read the Wikipedia page and im still confused

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    At the end of the day all governments are desperately afraid of making people angry (at them), from the healthiest democracy to the most totalitarian dictatorship, because the people are always the overwhelming majority, creating all the goods and services, creating the surplus that the rich and powerful exploit and enjoy, and therefore ultimately holding all the real power no matter how much legal, policing and enforcement structure is built around them. Some governments are just extremely creative at making people forget that or preventing them from learning it in the first place, while finding ways to manage their expectations to either convince them to be happy enough, or to make sure they’re always going to be angry at somebody else (or each other), or some combination of the two. They usually turn to the latter when they fail at the former. When they fail at both, it tends to become a revolution.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      At the end of the day all governments are desperately afraid of making people angry (at them), from the healthiest democracy to the most totalitarian dictatorship

      One would think so. But a quick glance at Russia, or even the current US one would show you otherwise.

      Most governments don’t seem to pay a lot of attention to it. Democracies tend to be the most concerned ones, but it still varies a lot.

      • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s because people can take a lot before becoming truly desperate. A revolution means risking mass death, and few are willing to sacrifice so others can have a better life.