• saimen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    What do you mean with quality of life? Remember people will only get their basic needs met. If they want more quality they have to pay for it and thus have to work. So the rest should be figured out by the free market (even better than now because labor market isn’t free if people have to work to survive). Of course there will be a certain percentage that is okay with just surviving but I am sure their needs can be met by the taxes of the overwhelming amount of people who want more than that.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Well, like I said, even today, it is basically impossible to starve to death in the Western world. You can get your caloric needs met from charity programmes and government assistance alone. It requires you to sacrifice your dignity and accept a very low quality of life, but you will not die.

      So if coercion is defined as “forced to perform some action under threat of not having one’s biological needs met”, nobody is in fact coerced to do anything.

      • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        and if you’re not doing good then there’s always the “go to jail” route: free housing and food, at the cost of your freedom

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          In some parts of the Western world (particularly in the US), prison is also forced labour. The state I live in has abolished it but many other states still have it.