• NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
      17·
      3 hours ago

      Actually there are several legal arguments about this currently ongoing. There is a lot of discussion and several lawsuits in progress.

      There isn’t really a final decision yet, but I think I agree with Cory Doctorow’s opinion that the solution is to make the output of generative AI tools uncopywritable/public domain. This protects artists broadly, as any company that wants to produce a copywrited final work (e.g. film, television, music, books, etc) will need to hire an artist to do it.

      • duhlieluh@lemmy.zipEnglish
        7·
        3 hours ago

        i think that should be a given but it does not solve peoples work being taken and mutilated by an algorithm.

        certainly takes incentive out of it for someone that wants to use it for a production, but im sure there are ways they would get around it.

  • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    571·
    4 hours ago

    Keep the donations coming. IA is worth a million times more to humanity than all of these publishers combined.

    • TWeaK@lemmy.todayEnglish
      9·
      3 hours ago

      I’m just glad they didn’t go into a protracted and expensive legal battle with this one, which isn’t exactly a good use of donated funds.