• bear_delune@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t think that’s “taking advantage of vulnerable people”

    The options still exist for people to learn and theming is incredibly inconsequential.

    They’re monetising to support development in a minimally impactful way, that is completely optional, and I think that’s a good thing.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      They should advertise that everything is free and can be installed after installation if you choose not say $80 gets you a Windows like desktop and software replacements that will save you thousands (Blender/Xournal++/OfficeSuite)

      • bear_delune@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The value proposition is ease of use and integration of these theming utilities.

        I honestly think this monetisation strategy of theirs is a non-issue.

        People who want a streamlined experience have the option of paying for that, people who want the option of doing it all themselves have that opportunity too.

          • bear_delune@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Not communicating that there are alternatives to their services?

            I don’t really think it’s their responsibility to spoon feed alternatives to their customers; they’re not being anticompetitive, they’re not being deceptive, they’re not blocking alternatives.

            I think your requirements here are unfair and kind of irrational