RewindAgain@futurology.today to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 2 months agoGame over. AGI is not imminent, and LLMs are not the royal road to getting there.garymarcus.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1128arrow-down1external-linkGame over. AGI is not imminent, and LLMs are not the royal road to getting there.garymarcus.substack.comRewindAgain@futurology.today to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square70fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarebooty [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoLLMs aren’t intelligence. We’ve had similar technology in more primitive forms for a long time, like Markov chains. LLMs are hyper specialized at passing a turing test but are not good at basically anything else.
minus-squarem532@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoA turing test has nothing to do with intelligence.
minus-squarebooty [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoWhat is your point?
minus-squarebooty [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 months agoI didn’t say turing tests had anything to do with intelligence. I didn’t define intelligence at all. What are you even talking about?
LLMs aren’t intelligence. We’ve had similar technology in more primitive forms for a long time, like Markov chains. LLMs are hyper specialized at passing a turing test but are not good at basically anything else.
A turing test has nothing to do with intelligence.
What is your point?
You define intelligence wrong.
I didn’t say turing tests had anything to do with intelligence. I didn’t define intelligence at all. What are you even talking about?