• IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    His mother was the murder in the first one and she was killed. Is having him grow up a retcon?

    • calliope@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yes, as I said they very clearly talk about how they changed the character completely between 1 and 2 in the book of interviews about the movies.

      Having a ghost child mysteriously grow up after being stuck in a lake and having his mom go on a murder spree was a retcon specifically for a sequel, yeah. They retroactively changed Jason’s continuity for the sequels.

      When was the last time you saw these movies? If it was recently we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

      • IWW4@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        But there really isn’t much those movies… a bunch of really hot teenagers go off to a lake and a dude chops the, up with the super creepy soundtrack in the background. don’t overthink it

        • calliope@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Hear me out: that’s what I mean!

          They are some of the silliest movies ever, but they cared so much how he became the character he became throughout the sequels.

          So it’s funny that between 1 and 2 they’re just like “jeez I don’t know, grew monstrous somehow and no one saw him?”

          The first one is the only time there’s any kind of continuity weirdness. I would argue the continuity is what makes the series as a whole fun to watch. From sequel to sequel they’ll keep the dents and cuts in his mask, they take some continuity strangely seriously.

          Even when it gets downright stupid, like he gets tied underwater after part 7(?), they take it seriously how he gets out in part 8. The ghost killer guy. It’s amazing.