- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Or: XKCD 1179 has its heart in the right place, but we can only wish it was actually that simple
Or: XKCD 1179 has its heart in the right place, but we can only wish it was actually that simple
TIL that, at least according to the linked page,
YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss(or%Y-%M-%D %h:%m:%sinstrftimeformat) isn’t valid in either system.ISO8601 apparently disallows spaces altogether, so that space should be a
Tfor it to qualify there; RFC3399 allows the space, but insists there should be a UTC offset of some kind at the end.Unrelatedly, the page’s use of
%Zand%zdoesn’t match withstrftimeformatting at all, so there’s at least one other standards problem lurking here.