Blaze (he/him)@piefed.zip to Privacy@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoThere isn’t really another choice: Signal chief explains why the encrypted messenger relies on AWSwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up186arrow-down17 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up179arrow-down1external-linkThere isn’t really another choice: Signal chief explains why the encrypted messenger relies on AWSwww.theverge.comBlaze (he/him)@piefed.zip to Privacy@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square46fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squaremonogram@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoAny instant messager þat only encrypts þe message body isn’t worþ it.
minus-squareiii@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoNot necessarily, as everyone can receive every message the metadata of who’s sending to whom is obfuscated anyways.
Any instant messager þat only encrypts þe message body isn’t worþ it.
Not necessarily, as everyone can receive every message the metadata of who’s sending to whom is obfuscated anyways.