As a Java engineer in the web development industry for several years now, having heard multiple times that X is good because of SOLID principles or Y is bad because it breaks SOLID principles, and having to memorize the “good” ways to do everything before an interview etc, I find it harder and harder to do when I really start to dive into the real reason I’m doing something in a particular way.
One example is creating an interface for every goddamn class I make because of “loose coupling” when in reality none of these classes are ever going to have an alternative implementation.
Also the more I get into languages like Rust, the more these doubts are increasing and leading me to believe that most of it is just dogma that has gone far beyond its initial motivations and goals and is now just a mindless OOP circlejerk.
There are definitely occasions when these principles do make sense, especially in an OOP environment, and they can also make some design patterns really satisfying and easy.
What are your opinions on this?
Especially in Java, it relies extremely heavy on the IDE, to make sense to me.
If you’re minimalist, like me, and prefer text editor to be seperate from linter, compiler, linker, it’s not pheasable. Because everything is so verbose, spread out, coupled based on convention.
So when I do work in Java, I reluctantly bring out Eclipse. It just doesn’t make any sense without.
Yeah, same. I like to code in Neovim, and OOP just doesn’t make any sense in there. Fortunately, I don’t have to code in Java often. I had to install Android Studio just because I needed to make a small bugfix in an app, it was so annoying. The fix itself was easy, but I had to spend around an hour trying to figure out where the relevant code exactly is.