I dont see why. Culturing cells back into stem cells is very cheap. Maybe expensive to do in bulk, but you dont need to do it in bulk. You only need maybe a dozen stem cells. The hard part would be modifying the cells to produce insulin. But once you have a retrovirus to do that, that becomes almost free considering its absurdly easy to replicate viruses. After that, youd just have to culture the cells to get more, again, very easy.
I havent read the article yet, but depending on how they reintroduce those cells back into the body is almost certainly the most expensive part excluding down investment on originally creating the virus, which only has to be done once.
Having read the article entirely, the answer is kinda. This particular patient had a lot of complications as a result of their diabetes, so they had to use a bunch of extra medications to prevent complications. No clue how expensive those were, but thats not a cost inherant to the process. If you were “fixed” as soon as your diabetes becomes apparant, that wouldnt be neccassary.
They also did a bunch of animal testing after having gone through the process of creating the cells. Strictly speaking, not meccassary for the future. It was neccassary here as it is a novel approach, and it will continue being neccassary until this is a regularly permormed operation. Once the process is widely regarded to be safe, and weve dialed in the exact process to controlling the production, that sortve testing should become obselete.
Finally, the transplant is absurdly cheap. Basically free.
All together, the reasearch is absurdly more expensive than the process. For most of the world, this should be a very effective, cheap, relatively fast, and noninvasive. This is huge news! Of course in the US you cant afford it.
I dont see why. Culturing cells back into stem cells is very cheap. Maybe expensive to do in bulk, but you dont need to do it in bulk. You only need maybe a dozen stem cells. The hard part would be modifying the cells to produce insulin. But once you have a retrovirus to do that, that becomes almost free considering its absurdly easy to replicate viruses. After that, youd just have to culture the cells to get more, again, very easy.
I havent read the article yet, but depending on how they reintroduce those cells back into the body is almost certainly the most expensive part excluding down investment on originally creating the virus, which only has to be done once.
Edit: see my comment below
Having read the article entirely, the answer is kinda. This particular patient had a lot of complications as a result of their diabetes, so they had to use a bunch of extra medications to prevent complications. No clue how expensive those were, but thats not a cost inherant to the process. If you were “fixed” as soon as your diabetes becomes apparant, that wouldnt be neccassary.
They also did a bunch of animal testing after having gone through the process of creating the cells. Strictly speaking, not meccassary for the future. It was neccassary here as it is a novel approach, and it will continue being neccassary until this is a regularly permormed operation. Once the process is widely regarded to be safe, and weve dialed in the exact process to controlling the production, that sortve testing should become obselete.
Finally, the transplant is absurdly cheap. Basically free.
All together, the reasearch is absurdly more expensive than the process. For most of the world, this should be a very effective, cheap, relatively fast, and noninvasive. This is huge news! Of course in the US you cant afford it.