cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52834195

https://archive.is/je5sj

“If adopted, these amendments would not simplify compliance but hollow out the GDPR’s and ePrivacy’s core guarantees: purpose limitation, accountability, and independent oversight,” Itxaso Dominguez de Olazabal, from the European Digital Rights group, told EUobserver.

The draft includes adjustments to what is considered “personal data,” a key component of the GDPR and protected by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Then why change the rules? The article’s author seems quite convinced that this will make AI training easier.

    • ag10n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because they want to strip the right to privacy so they can better monetize

      Naive to think the GDPR is stopping anyone now.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Naive to think the GDPR is stopping anyone now.

        So again, why change the rules? If the GDPR is already ineffective there’s no need to loosen it more.

        • ag10n@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Are you asking me why some in Europe want to make it legal? Because they’re already doing it, just they want to make it legal

          Make sense?

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            If they’re already doing it then no change is necessary. So why change it?

            If making it legal makes it easier for them to do, then that was my original point. That’s why I think they’re making the change.

            • ag10n@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Because laws are supposed to have teeth and consequences There is zero doubt that everything public on the internet or otherwise is consumed and aggregated by these companies; you still don’t understand why weakening regulations benefits them?

              • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                So you are saying that weakening these regulations makes it easier for these companies to train AI on that data?

                That’s exactly what I’ve been saying all along too. I’m not sure what you think is being argued about here, or what you think I’m not understanding.

                • ag10n@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  You’re the one asking questions about changing it

                  It’s clear that weaker regulations allow them to do more with impunity as I originally stated

                  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    No I’m not, I was explaining why I thought they changed it. You appeared to be arguing that there was some other reason, so I was asking what you thought that reason was.

                    As it turns out, though, you’re saying they changed it for exactly the same reasons I said they were changing it. To let them more easily train AI on that data. So that leaves me wondering what exactly the point of all this was.