They might not be noticing the noise. Earwax buildup, reduced hearing or different angles etc.

Could be that they are in a hurry or that the door is tight too?

Learn how to breathe

Any pointers or tutorials/videos that you’d recommend on this?
Is it about diaphragmatic breathing?
Or remembering to breathe calmly while exercising or doing things?

That’s a cool mindset, if the fck around part is not too extreme

Which ones do you find most useful?

Intrinsic motivation?

Less bad is good there too

And as you said, not a good comparison.

Pollution going beyond the capacity of our environment is the issue, right? Every decent improvement is a good thing there. Not that we should stay silent with that, but we should be cheering for improvements and encouraging them.

Less bad is good, right?

Obviously, stuff like better public transportation will be good
Electric buses, trains etc

Have been hearing about China’s solar adoption and them looking into thorium reactors.
My country, India, seems to be looking more into solar too.

I think it’s a correct direction. Though, the pace needs to be a bit faster

Reporting and fining drunken drivers need to speed up in the location.

Are electric cars a net improvement?
I’ve heard that they are, because electricity can ve produced more efficiently and pollution can be better handled than individual car exhausts

Who uses that term tho?
I think it’s used by progressives. So they might be blind to loneliness of women?

Lack of practice?

I had started taking selfies with a smile to see how my hair was growing, to see which amount of hair seems good for me

My smiles in group photos seem more nice nowadays.

So, maybe try that?

Bite-sized stuff?

I see cool quotes or memes that are also linked to recent/contemporary things and it gets my interest to look more into it

I have a friend and she thinks “its posh” to read theory.

Well, maybe recommending things that would be directly useful for her or things that she likes would be good?
And tell that it’ll also be useful to counter fake narratives and provide clarity in talking about it to others?

I’m Indian, specifically Sourh Indian.
We learn English in our schools and it is the main medium for school and college education.

But your leftists would need to try elections as a way to raise points that unite the people and check for support, right?

Though, structural changes via elections alone may be sabotaged. People like your current Pres or others may not respect election results if a decent left wins and tries to restructure and limit your issues like lobbying. So you’d need to be ready for that too.

Are you from USAmerica? If yes, you do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

If not, are they in this list:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penal_labour#By_country

Not really

We have more tech n all, right?

Is it a big enough concern to not go in that direction?

Even if it can’t be 100%, wouldn’t 99% or even 90% be good, right?

Or is it a theoretical question?

How does someone get funded by your cabal?

The Bhaghat Singh profile picture is quite awesome

I often ask for source.
And sometimes I find that it’s headlines that are sensationalist or a specific interpretation of something.

Like, someone claims ‘XYZ believes/supports in ABC’, often to paint XYZ badly. I ask for source on it and they give an article where the XYZ is talking about something related to ABC or talking with someone related to ABC

I also ask for source, because of that.

As an example:
I had heard lots of anti-socialist stuff like the Molotov-Ribbentrop non-aggression pact, USSR invaded Poland etc. After joining lemmy and some reddit subs, I came to know about how the USSR was one of the last countries to create a non-aggression pact and other countries like Britain, France already had pacts and agreements. And that it happened after the Munich agreement where Britain, France and Italy came togethe to allow the Nazis annexation of Czechoslovakia.

I also learnt about how Poland invaded Czechoslovakia together with Nazi Germany and also denied USSR’s request asking permission for passage of its army to Czechoslovakia against the Nazi invasion.

So, I understand the value of asling for source and getting the context.

I do try to share sources as possible too. Though, it’s mostly wikipedia articles and may not be seen as a primary sources, but still.

1934 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German–Polish_declaration_of_non-aggression
1935 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-German_Naval_Agreement
1938 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement
1939 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact

So everyone had pacts and agreements with everyone, but when taken out of context and presented to denigrate, it has an effect on some.

So, generally I ask for source or context for most things