FFS, stop trying to kill your platform. You’re trying to turn a golden goose into a platinum goose but you’re going to end up with a regular goose if you keep going. You’ve already pushed me away from the platform because of your changes to side loading. Making people pay more for the same thing doesn’t make your product more luxurious.

For real. The smart features may be terrible but LG has some of the top TVs in the market. The picture quality is great. I’d love to know what they think looks good if something like the C5 “looks SO terrible.”

A broken clock and all.

I’m so tired of “smart” tech. “Smart” is becoming synonymous with abuse. Seems like that’s all these companies do with it.

I thought the same thing, but I saw one just a few months ago. It made me wonder the last one I saw. Had to be years and years ago.

Idk about Dollar General and such, but every place I go to tells you the subtotal (before tax) and total (after tax). I find it it be pretty easy but I’m also paying attention to prices as they ring up.

Jesus christ, some of these things rang up >50% more expensive. Do people really not notice stuff like this? I’d love to say I catch it every time it happens, but that’s probably some type of bias. I’ve definitely caught it several times over the years.

It’s also illegal for them, at least in my state but I hope in all states, to not honor the shelf price when pointed out. They are also required to update the shelf price in a timely manner afterward. Can’t remember the exact time but I want to say it’s a day or two. If they don’t, you can report them.

I’ve had this happen a few times. And at Home Depot the employee ripped off the shelf tag off right in front of me. Honored the price, of course.

🤣🤣🤣

The things tech bros say are too amusing. So delusional; all of it.

Just when I started considering that maybe it’s time to look at new parts, a new hurdle candy into view. My computer might graduate from elementary school before I can get a decent price on parts. Or maybe they’re will never be decent prices on parts again.

Liar, I see those bananas in your kitchen.

I did none of that and they gave me a real ID when I last renewed.

American here. Looks around. Couldn’t agree more.

Would be nice if they included the average current power consumption, per chip and total. It’s a hell of a reduction in any case, but if the total is a drop compared to other power consumption then it’s just taking a few drops out of the bucket.

The amount of methods used to inject things into a model is pretty high.

Yea, I felt a lot were missing which made me wonder what criteria was used in the first place.

I will stay a coward.

It’s a much more exclusive list than I initially expected so I’m less sure how I feel about the reclassification. But somehow Theology made the cut? Just… what?

My brain is ready to explode.

4 Hapsburgs walk out?

My conclusion is that the author doesn’t know how to use OOP properly and thus is calling the entire thing garbage. You only have to look at the method vs function argument to see that.

I program in both styles every day. They both have advantages and disadvantages. Though, admittedly, it’s difficult to differentiate between IDE benefits, language benefits, and language style (FP vs OOP) benefits.

I’ll tell you what I hate about the FP language I use. How do you determine if two objects are related to one another in some way? Hope and pray to God someone documented it because the language sure won’t give you any hints. If you set up your objects in OOP right, it’s all laid out in the models.

Not trying to shit on her, but what a terrible name. Why name someone in such a way that it doesn’t even sound like a name to most people? That sucks for everyone.