• 7 Posts
  • 795 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 20th, 2023

help-circle

  • Crusts like this generally require a lot of steam in the oven

    Fair enough!

    And shaping/forming a loaf that stays tall when being baked on a flat surface takes skill, lots of practice and experience.

    Or a fairly inexpensive machine that will do it for you. Of course though, there’s a special pleasure in making a truly artisan bread with your own hands. But hey, it’s not that hard if you know what you’re doing. Best to see it in action.

    But then again, I speak from the side of low-scale industrial baking. For a home baker, all this machinery will be an overkill.



  • Baking in a rectangular shape allows you to make a space efficient bread that you can easily stack and transport. Also, it is very predictable, can fit neatly into your toaster, and can be cut in triangles.

    Making bread on a flat surface allows you to minimize costs of entry (not only don’t you need the forms which are relatively cheap, you can go with simpler/cheaper ovens), and this kind of bread has a more pronounced crust, which many people like.

    Also, rectangular bread is harder to leaven for a long period of time as it comes with numerous technological complications down the production line. This affects the aroma composition, making rectangular bread less attractive for those who want the traditional “bread” taste.

    Baguette, as I already mentioned, has a unique crust and crumb texture defined by the shape and baking conditions. Many people like it that way.


  • ELI5: dough can take any shape you give it.

    You can load the dough into a metallic shape and close it with a lid, and you’ll get picture 1.

    Or you can make a ball out of it and leave it be on a flat surface, and it will naturally expand to look like picture 2.

    Side question: narrow shape makes baguette have a more crispy texture, which many people like. It’s also usually produced using a special kind of sourdough, which makes it have unique and rich taste. People eat it as is (just biting it from one end to another) or make small open sandwiches by cutting it in slices and putting all sorts of toppings on top of them.




  • I feel this way about religion.

    It is literally being bullied by a supernatural creature that doesn’t even exist. Do X, do not do Y, else the entire wrath of the Almighty will be upon you.

    And at the same time the Almighty can do absolutely anything they want - mass murder people, sleep with anyone, get everyone drunk, tell father to kill the son - because what, are you gonna defy or question someone who else destroys you and tarnishes your soul for the rest of eternity?

    The good is replaced with compliance, because an authoritative voice says what’s good and you better obey. 1984 type shit, invented millenia before.





  • That’s one of my gripes with Arch, too. It takes too much manual interaction on an everyday basis, it’s not a “set it and forget it” kind of system.

    To some, sometimes lesser, extent it also translates to its derivatives, be it Endeavour, Garuda, Manjaro or whatever strikes one’s fancy.





  • These odd freezes, especially when moving files at scale, is something I struggled with on all Arch-based distros I had installed: Arch itself, EndeavourOS, Manjaro.

    Either Arch doesn’t like my hardware in some way, or it’s just something Arch users struggle with.

    Any other distros worked just fine in that regard.


  • Allero@lemmy.todaytolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldArch btw...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Arch can be configured without archinstall in 20 minutes by a YouTube video even if you’re a grandma with 0 technical skills.

    Let’s all stop pretending that having it manually installed means anything and just use whatever does it for us. Like, well, Endeavour.


  • To me, it’s more like the Netherlands giving out free syringes and needles so that drug consumers at least wouldn’t contract something from the used ones.

    To be clear: granting any and all pedophiles access to therapy would be of tremendous help. I think it must be done. But there are two issues remaining:

    1. Barely any government will scrape enough money to fund such programs now that therapy is astronomically expensive
    2. Even then, plenty of pedophiles will keep consuming CSAM, legally or not. There must be some incentives for them to choose the AI-generated option that is at least less harmful than the alternative.