Fair point!

But again, this is mostly useful in a production environment, not as a home user imo.

Driving above ~150 km/h is never ever safe, which is why Germany is such an outlier, while about every other country does not allow for it.

Autobahns are significantly more deadly than other roads.

This is basically Formula-1 race car/small aircraft speed.

Regular cars will only get you to, like, 160-180 km/h at full gas.

In other words, this is insanely fast and potentially very deadly.

At speeds above ~150 km/h, even on a well-organized highway, you won’t be able to control your surroundings and have to rely on sheer luck to survive, unless you’re a professional race pilot on an empty road. Also, unless the car is equipped with special gear for improved road grip, it will become uncontrollable because it will literally start to hover a little.

We’re talking risk for the system here.

Sure, I had to make that distinction. I only mean personal home use here.

Honestly, my current stance on immutable distros is: why don’t you have a mutable distro and just try to follow the best practices without being forced to?

Install flatpaks, use Distrobox when something is only available as a standard package, but doesn’t actually depend on non-isolated system interaction, etc.

This way, nothing breaks the way it does with immutable distros, but you still have a reasonable level of confidence in your system.

Absolutely!

Yep

Essentially yes.

Normally, the amount of neutrons generated in a fusion reactor is an issue. Here it is an asset.

If some magical genie pays for it, clothes. My phone is not expensive, but clothes are pretty hefty priced these days.

Yup, already loooooong ago

UPD. Checked it out, the second part was released in 2016

…or you do neither of those?

Alright bud, you went too far into angry trolling territory.

Gosh, what .today has become these days…

This is one of the most problematic parts about vigilante justice and why it should be gone for good, regardless of what they are trying to achieve.

Nope, I’m not getting there. Sure, ephebophilia is a thing, and so is hebephilia, but in a given context there’s no point in this distinction.

I’m only saying that many cases of child abuse do not involve pedophiles/hebephiles/ephebophiles/whatever. Children are the easiest to take advantage of, and this is what drives quite a few hypersexual non-pedophiles to become child abusers despite not being predominantly attracted to children/minors to begin with.

Regardless of reasons, whoever abuses children deserves punishment - although I would much prefer for the police, not vigilantes, to be involved in it.

Guess this is what happens when you meet real people online who are not artificially enraged - a productive conversation!

Good luck proving you’re not anything to an angry mob.

Sure, but shows of this kind commonly imply that all pedophiles are child abusers and all child abusers are pedophiles, neither of which is true - and such equations have real-world negative implications.

There’s one more angle to this - apart from the raise in vigilante violence and messing up with police operations which both are very valid.

Just as we stopped getting TV feeds constantly equating pedophiles to child molesters, those guys stepped in to fill the void.

Pedophiles are not inherently child molesters. This kind of equation is not only wrong, it also adds to promoting dangerous behaviors among them.

Plenty of pedophiles will never abuse a single child, knowing full well it is dangerous and harmful for minors to be engaged in such relationships. However, the more we equate pedophiles to predators, the more people, especially in the emotionally vulnerable groups like teen pedophiles, will actually accept themselves in this role. Among those who stands against this anyway, plenty will become suicidal, not seeing an option to live a non-offending life.

Current methods of therapy aimed at reducing child abuse rates go very strongly on this - pedophiles should face message of them not being inherently dangerous, not the message of them being an immediate and imminent danger. Not only this is scientifically correct, it is actually useful in making these people safer for others.

Ah, that’s what you mean

I thought of concentrating a solution (as in dissolved substance)