

Ohh you’re correct! Thanks for pointing that out:)) I will fix it:)
Yo [he/him]
Don’t DM me, find me on Matrix (or XMPP) instead
Alts at:


Ohh you’re correct! Thanks for pointing that out:)) I will fix it:)


Pings of Week #13:
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]


Hm, since this a megathread it probably fits to send here my overall notes (that keep expanding as I read more):
https://codeberg.org/BlastboomStrice/book-notes/src/branch/main/AFAQ-Summary.md
I try to “compress” the content by ~90% in the summary and in the end I might make a summary of the summary (at the end of the file maybe)? This is a long project:)


Anarchist opposition to private property rests on two, related, arguments. These were summed up by Proudhon’s maxims (from What is Property? that “property is theft” and “property is despotism.” In his words, “Property . . . violates equality by the rights of exclusion and increase, and freedom by despotism . . . [and has] perfect identity with robbery.” [Proudhon, What is Property, p. 251] Anarchists, therefore, oppose private property (i.e. capitalism) because it is a source of coercive, hierarchical authority as well as exploitation and, consequently, elite privilege and inequality. It is based on and produces inequality, in terms of both wealth and power.
We will summarise each argument in turn.
Umm, question, which are the arguments here? These?
Or am I getting it wrong? (I’m trying to keep some notes)
EDIT I think I figured it out:
Property:


Lol as I’m keeping notes, this reminded me of the importance of impermanence in nixos
The state also ends up marginalising “our” representatives
- As power rests not in the elected bodies, but in a bureaucracy, popular control becomes increasingly meaningless
- It’s the institutions that have power in the state due to their permanence, not the representatives who come and go
What if the leftovers of programs in the filesystem make up the bureaucracy of the operating system? And thats why we try to make state-less systems?


Yay, I finished B.3 haha:)


Yay, I finished B.3:)
Edit: wrong post


Pings of Week #12:
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]


TIPP10 maybe? Thats how I learnt (I installed it though, but it has an online version too)


Yeah, eventually, I’ll just reping you weekly in this post for a few weeks and not move any further


So yeah, I’m giving some extra structure to the weekly reading we do.
This megathread should (hopefully) make things better:
PS. Feedback request: Let me know what you think, I discussed it a bit on the matrix server, but I’d like some broader feedback on this. I initially started this using hexbear’s way of doing group readings, but I feel like this is a huge book and probably needs a different organisation.


Pings of Week #11:
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]


What do you think? Should we maybe do a pause with these posts until we catch up? Should I just make posts without new parts to read? Should we just continue going slowly? I’m in B.2.3 I think…


Pings:
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]


Yoo yeah:)


Pings:
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]




Yeah yeah:)
Im seeing a pattern here (capitalism)