Same, I hardly ever look at my phone anymore during the day. I just glance at my notifications from my watch, if it’s not important I swipe it away and if it’s something I need to follow-up on I’ll just leave it for later. Then I go right back to whatever I was doing.

I get distracted a lot less these days, and my phone gets insane battery life now. My Pixel 6 is several years old now, but it still regularly gets 48+ hours of life because of how little wear I put on the battery.

Honestly, I’d rather see another studio take a crack at the franchise. I don’t know whether Gamefreak have lost a lot of important talent over the years or if they just got lazy because their games are guaranteed to sell no matter how poorly they’re produced, but they do not know how to make games in the current era. Full stop. The last handful of mainline Pokemon titles have been unacceptably poor quality, and Nintendo won’t light a fire under their ass because… why would they, when they’re already printing money?

I think it would be wildly beneficial to the health of the franchise if a completely new studio took the wheel for a minute. They don’t have to reinvent the game mechanics or take the story in some dark and gritty direction or anything like that, but if they just made it functional that’d already be a huge step up over Gamefreak’s last few releases.

Personally, I’d love to see Retro Studios take a crack at a mainline Pokemon title. They’ve already got a very close relationship with Nintendo, and have released nothing but bangers.

You might just be the cingiest motherfucker on Lemmy. And that’s saying something, when I already know Dragonfucker exists.

It is therefore more than understandable that, in this case where nobody died, some people will see this as a positive message.

If it requires this many paragraphs of mental gymnastics to explain, maybe it’s not as uplifting as you think is is. Nobody else here seems to be as insistently obtuse on this issue as you.

Bro just shut the fuck up already, this isn’t the place.

I get it, short thoughts and lack of nuance get you fast upvotes but you’re describing something that is not happening.

Sir, this is a Wendy’s /c/UpliftingNews. Not every single space on the Internet has to be a fucking social warzone.

I’m gonna be honest, I think the “someone I don’t like had something bad happen” stories being posted here are getting tired. We get it, celebrities suck. But I subscribed to this community because I want actual uplifting news, not snarky posts that would be better-suited to a comment in the original thread.

The electric costs aren’t nearly as high as people think. For huge datacenters, yes, but that’s because they’re processing requests for hundreds or thousands of users simultaneously. For a studio using it to translate lines for a single game, they could easily get away with doing it locally, and effectively for free. You can train your own local model on a consumer-grade PC without any issue, and it’ll still run just as fast as the big server farm-powered models.

My roommate has been playing with a bunch of different local AI models on his own PC for a couple years now. There’s been no discernable change to our electric bill. His PC draws more power playing an anime waifu gacha game than it does training/generating AI.

Was.

Por que no los dos?

But then you wouldn’t see the shadow.

You and I are posting on the Fediverse right now (capital F). If I create two of my own personal Lemmy instances that only federate with each other, they’re not a part of the Fediverse. I’ve now created my own fediverse (lower-case F). The Fediverse is a fediverse, but not all fediverses are the Fediverse.

Same with internet and Internet. There is the main, collective Internet that we all know and use daily, but it’s one of many internets.

I think a big part of this sentiment has to do with Bungie burning a lot of bridges with their fan base in recent years. I’d played Destiny 2 for several years (from Shadowkeep through The Final Shape), and in that time Bungie had made a lot of very unpopular moves. From things like the “Destiny Content Vault” (where old content was removed from the game to make room for new content), expansions getting delayed by several months, massive studio layoffs, apparent mismanagement of an entire expansion (Lightfall), more studio layoffs… It’s just really hard, as a player, to back a Bungie project right now. I no longer feel like their priorities line up with mine.

Meanwhile, I’ve also been a huge fan of Embark’s previous game, The Finals. It’s a totally different type of FPS compared to Destiny, yet they managed to capture my interest by doing correctly all the things Bungie did wrong. They nailed the monetization of the game and it doesn’t feel predatory, they listen to their community, and they constantly show a commitment toward making The Finals into the best game it can be (and not necessarily the most profitable game it could be).

So while Marathon looks like it’s got all the makings for an amazing game, I just don’t feel like Bungie fans have enough faith left in Bungie anymore. For a lot of people, myself included, The Final Shape was the “end” of Destiny; not because Bungie stopped making it (they’re still releasing content), but because we got the closure we wanted out of Destiny’s story and we’re just done with Bungie’s antics.

That said, I just don’t like extraction shooters. I played a bit of Arc Raiders to see how it is, and it’s just not for me. Honestly, I hope both games do well, because it’s clear that both studios put a lot of heart into these games and I’m interested in learning about both games’ stories. But right now, Bungie has to overcome their reputation if they want Marathon to succeed.

Nobody called you anything, dude. Are we having different conversations or something?

Are you talking about the hypothetical scenario you made up about the subject you don’t even understand? No wonder we’re going in circles.

I’m talking about the article.

Bruh. The task was to mislead. That’s what it did.

That’s not completing a task.

That’s faking a result for appearance.

That was the task.

So working as designed means presenting false info?

Yes. It was told to conduct a task. It did so. What part of that seems unintentional to you?

Read about how LLMs actually work before you read articles written by people who don’t understand LLMs. The author of this piece is suggesting arguments that imply that LLMs have cognition. “Lying” requires intent, and LLMs have no intention, they only have instructions. The author would have you believe that these LLMs are faulty or unreliable, when in actuality they’re working exactly as they’ve been designed to.

Do these backups also contain the edit histories?