You re-read an re-read again. Either be direct or just go away and stop flagulating yourself.
BTW, your nobels in the mail.
Way to avoid my question for the umpteenth time
What best describes this curve.
Real world data does not behave according to a precieved underlying function. The functions we use are only useful as models. Models are approximations.
Surprised fox didnt comment how this is against the natural order and bringing back gold from space will unleash a hoard of demons on the earth.
Without the “knee” of the curve there is no exponential growth.
What best describes this curve
Edit: Maybe I have it wrong. From now on I will only model data as exponential functions because they are potentially exponential and the data set is just incomplete.
Its all over for me now!
Well there it is
it doesn’t suddenly “become” exponential at the rapid increase, it’s exponential the whole time.
What type of growth would you use to describe the advancement of AI?
Uh, no. That’s too personal. Either you take what im saying at face value or you dont. If there was a time I could sit down and pass a heat and mass transfer exam that is long passed.
Its a thing you do to get into higher level classes. Then never think about again.
So your claim is that curve was generated using an exponential function?
I concede, that appears to be the case.
Now this one
What function generated this curve?
Which case is that? Have we moved goal posts or are you claiming this line:
Was generated using the function y=exp(x)?
That’s the curve of the line?
Your data as in you generated it? Or that’s the function that fits the curve shown in the graph?
The actual values are exactly as shown on the graph. Do you know what graphs are?
In your data what is the exponential function?
Let’s start there then. What are the basic properties of exponential functions?
Does the data originate from an exponential? Can you prove it?
But if it is a linear function it doesnt matter if you only use two points. Unless the function is not linear. If the line isn’t completely smooth you could also use a polynomial function that would fit the curve. Unless it exhibits exponential behavior why would you ever model it as an exponential if linear or polynomial models the data more accurately?
Do you accept that if we put together a metric to measure the advancement of AI that it would indicate it is growing over time?
Nope. There isn’t an infinite number of linear functions that will fit this curve. Based on the slope and y intercept there is only one linear function. There may be other approximations but only one line of best fit that will predict future outcomes.
You dont have to bring them to court with it for it to be useful. It could be used to target individuals then they use more conventional methods of evidence gathering to arrest.
I would guess they arent currently doing it enmasse because that doesnt sound useful either. I would say, solely on a vibes based level its been done by US intelligence. Its really not so different than a wiretap.