2·
4 days agoBurgess is a TITAN of literature, Stephen King wished he was half as good as Burgess.
Having said that I don’t think Kubrick made a better film but god dam his film is so good.
DripDripDrip
Use to be Twitter_Expat at Mastodon World.
Soon moving into my own instance.
Commenting on everything that needs a comment.
Voy a comentar en contra del Chavismo a TODOS los post que mencionen a #Venezuela
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: February 25th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
@memfree I am going to make angry a lot of people but here I go. The Shinning by Kubrick of course. I personally dont care for Stephen King Literary work I think in the whole context of human literature is absolute TRASH. But in the History of world Cinema Kubrick is up there in the mount Olympus of the Best of the best. The fact that Stephen king cannot understand a medium like Cinema made me choose this one even more. PLUS the fact that Stephen King Made a TV series because he didn’t like Kubrick version and is ABSOLUTE FORGETTABLE TRASH is the cherry on top. Im not sure if Kubrick did the same with Eyes Wide Shut… that is debatable.
@memfree
I’m going to keep adding:
Stalker by Tarkovsky
And I will say that every work of Tarkovsky that is based on literature with the expiation of Solaris (it’s my personal take). I believe that if Tarkovsky had a better budget Solaris would be the best sci fi film of all times. Some production of that film distracts me from the geniality of Tarkovsky.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalker/_(1979/_film)