I wonder if a user agent spoofer would get around that?

The rusty wrench approach

I think I actually learned the word عبادة from transliteration now that you mention it. Thanks for pointing that out!

It’s funny you say this because it was around the time I became self aware that I started to doubt religion.

I’m curious about your point of view bc ur comment sounds like you don’t believe in religion but your username sounds like something religious(I’m not a native Arabic speaker). It roughly translates to “witness of worship”, right?

It really depends on tone and how long the interaction would last. I’d consider saying that rude most of the time as the person making small talk is just doing something nice.

I’m not exactly sure how to respond to that.

Yes

Are there any versions where you don’t have to pay to find the link of yourself?

The only thing I build from source on a normal basis is LMMS because there’s some features on main you just can’t get anywhere else. For example, the slicer that comes with LMMS nightly isn’t in the builds, and particularly recently someone pushed a commit that allows for resizing of the slicer, so I just had to pull that and build it.

This sounds amazing! I will also put here there’s also chronometer that has a lot of the same functionality as fitnesspal but without the subscription, but you have to use an account.

I’m not an expert but I’m guessing unencrypted DNS requests and potentially monitoring IPs of different torrents. DNS requests would show what websites a user is going to, and then you can always see peer IPs when connected to a torrent.

…28?

Why not just compress a directory then encrypt that?

Sweet - I didn’t realize that malware is tailored for one OS usually, but that makes a lot more sense.

This is great I really appreciate it :)

Why do the tech heads show why it won’t be adopted mainstream any time soon?

Linux doesn’t always work. We know that. But it looks like you’re misconstruing your specific issue with some broader argument for Linux being mainstream. The fact that you connected it to a switch tells me that youre already more advanced than the average user. I get you’re annoyed, but you can also just ask about your specific issue.

The article made a few good points, but a good amount of it was conjecture. I liked the part about comparing the two functions and showing that exceptions are faster but I think a big thing he’s not getting is readability. Even in the functions he showed, you can directly see that the one using std::expected has the happy path and error path directly in the function signature, whereas the exception one doesn’t.

As for the “error kind” trap he was talking about, that definitely exists, but ignores the fact that you can also get this same kind of error from exceptions. I’ve definitely gotten exceptions that I didn’t understand from Python or Java libraries, but it’s not a problem with exceptions but a problem with how they’re shown. If there’s nothing to tell me that I should have thought of that error, it shouldn’t be an expectation for a dev to have thought of it.

Lemon

Before scraping I would verify that there is no HTTP API that you can use to craft requests instead of scraping from the website. These might be higher quality than what you can scrape. If there is no easy to use http API, go to scraping then. I would generally consider scraping the last option, unless it’s a ridiculously easy website to scrape.