• 2 Posts
  • 160 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 21st, 2024

help-circle




  • I read through the article. Apparently the studio shared work-in-progress content to prove it wasn’t made using AI.

    I don’t know if they used AI or not, but this type of thing has been happening since the inception of gen AI. Shortly after the release of Stable Diffusion 1.5, moderators of r/Art were banning people who had been around for years because their art suddenly “looked like A.I.” and told they should “Get a better art style.”

    In the intervening time, this type of thinking has spread. Just yesterday, I was watching a YouTube video, and they used a certain background in it which they had used before to no note. This time, however, one user claimed that background was A.I. That was all it took to send the comments into a deluge of hatred and accusations.

    Here, though… I ask, if work-in-progress PSDs showing the in-progress art don’t meet the burden of proof to sate these accusations, what does? How long will it be until the only safe form of art to avoid these accusations is a photo of a pencil sketch with a hand-written date nearby?



  • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.comtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldLinus Comparison
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    (Emails eventually came out showing Billet Labs told them to keep the cooler, and then lied about it)

    Which is why LTT made a monetized apology video saying it was an accident and they had intended to return it, right? A video in which they leaked a private phone number related to Billet Labs, might I add.

    The person you responded to provided a simplified explanation. You, on the other hand, have provided one that is false.

    Billet Labs initially stated that they could keep it, yes, but after the ridiculous, defamatory review performed on the entirely wrong hardware, they requested it back, which LMG agreed to provide prior to selling it at auction.