What?

How were they ever allowed?

I was in school from the transition from no mobiles at all to smart phones. If you got caught with one it was whipped off you.

ADHD is a neurological condition which impacts your ability to do these things so yes, the fact that a neurological condition impacts your ability to do these things is exclusive and makes it a ‘tax’ beyond the neurotypical ability to do these things.

Medication and therapy helps me with every issue I have apart from these actually. It’s like there’s no neural connections between my will and ability to do these things.

My ADHD wife does them for me instead and I use my OCD superpowers to keep the place tidy as repayment.

Gen X got the brunt of that though not millennials. They started phasing out lead in 1973. Autism isn’t a mental disorder and not one linked to lead exposure afaik

Pretty sure Trump said he wanted Zuck executed

Same that’s why we organised between the students. Lecturers weren’t handing this out

I assumed we were upvoting them to laugh at them.

Not gonna watch a 30min video but the title is legit. They’ve wrote books and stuff on it, not really a secret.

https://www.vcinfodocs.com/what-is-the-network-state

edit: actually from the description/timestamps it looks like a good watch.

Was very common in my uni. We had our full degree on mega so could read ahead.

Op needs to infiltrate the Oxford student fb group

Well it’s not his tool as you clarified. But we know Marc is in contact with both ai16z and musk. And would certainly like to do the things alleged.

Believe the breadcrumb he’s referring to is using Trump as the public example. Maybe the prompt correlates to bot messages posted to Twitter too.

He says ‘we left’, so he personally wouldn’t have needed the perms.

H1b doesn’t seem like a red flag to me. Plenty in my year got entry roles in FAANG in the US after their degrees and had to get h1b sponsorship. Musk got rid of most other staff and only has a skeleton crew of loyalists and h1bs. I imagine most the remaining 10% are aware intricacies of the various interference he’s demanded. (Many of which are documented outside of this).

They are ‘advanced’ in that LLMs can now trick most people when they couldn’t a few years ago. Think you’re reading too much into that there. Seems unlikely the people who want to manipulate people with chatbots would have the self awareness to create an ad like this. Maybe a leftist putting together the obvious and embellishing but seems a bit too coincidental.

You’re right he’s not the founder but he is an investor and has interacted with them publicly

https://x.com/yb_effect/status/1864331680078811351

That third party was founded by Marc Andreessen. He’s currently staffing doge and on the board of meta. He switched to maga as he believes in accelerating tech at all costs (effective accelerationism) and has written a manifesto on it. As well as publicly commenting about convincing the public of the truth via social media. If he didn’t do what the post is claiming he would’ve wished he did.

His publicly stated goals are basically to Elysium us

https://www.vcinfodocs.com/what-is-the-network-state

Where do you think he’s running in his dreams.

Better interaction here, but lots of posts with 0 comments

Good, then they’ll come here. Only thing this place is missing is users.

Of course. They can’t accept that they’re the weirdos.

“It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured.”

No.

The only way his autism is related is if he overestimated how funny it would be. But he 100% meant to do a Nazi salute. Twice, and then repeated a dog whistle to the 14-words.

I mean, don’t friend, or put high trust on people you don’t know is pretty strong. Due to the “six degrees of separation” phenomenon, it scales pretty easily as well. If you have stupid friends that friend bots you can cut them off all, or just lower your trust in them.

Know IRL? Seems it would inherently limit discoverability and openness. New users or those outside the immediate social graph would face significant barriers to entry and still vulnerable to manipulation, such as bots infiltrating through unsuspecting friends or malicious actors leveraging connections to gain credibility.

“Post-turing” is pretty strong. People who’ve spent much time interacting with LLMs can easily spot them. For whatever reason, they all seem to have similar styles of writing.

Not the good ones, many conversations online are fleeting. Those tell-tale signs can be removed with the right prompt and context. We’re post turing in the sense that in most interactions online people wouldn’t be able to tell they were speaking to a bot, especially if they weren’t looking - which most aren’t.