not what antinatalist says

Going about that by forced sterilization, coercion, abuse, or eugenics would be bad for obvious reasons

Yeah an Mein Kampf is a book. The thing is that if antinatalism would genuinely improve the world it means it does have the goal to be implemented in all of society. This mean you’re gonna need to set a standard through rules and to enforce them. Those are the means.

Oh and if Antinatalism think having children is already bad, it clearly present having disabled children as worse

people who suffer their life have a need to express it. People who are fine don’t. Simple survivor bias

I would hate to have a child knowing they would likely have to face racial discrimination

Yep easier to die than dealing with the problem and, you know trying to do something. You know thank god everyone before us choose that instead of striving for social progress, that’s precisely why society has been steadily progressing towards amelioration for at the VERY least the past 500 years.

I do not find it moral to have a child because they may be gay, or autistic, or gender nonconforming, or poor

So… that, my friend, is turbo-eugenics. Yes, because you finding it immoral to have kids because they could be those things means that, if you had a mean to have kids, without those risks it would at least be less immoral. Oh and before you start to find excuse : making every argument for something and just saying at the end that it is bad is not being against something.