Context:

Remove liberal global affairs, replace with Republican: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgrw785585wo

Donation to Trump inauguration and more context: https://apnews.com/article/meta-facts-trump-musk-community-notes-413b8495939a058ff2d25fd23f2e0f43

Trump appeasement. Looks like he’s still pissed he was banned. Meta looking desperate.

Nope. It’s a US election, Trump appeasement thing. Meta replaced Nick Clegg (a UK liberal) with a Republican (Kaplan) for global affairs lead and this came out a few days later. A few days before they donated $1m to the inauguration ceremony. Prior to this, there was talk of Trump being pretty annoyed with Meta.

This is all shameful capitulation and political appeasement. They really teaching politicians how to do politics.

In order to avoid political confrontation, they sold all those that wanted a safe space.

Questions against it is usually bigoted. It seemed to be the popular MAGA dogwhistle this election.

Yes. I’m pretty sure Stallman isn’t on Facebook. Doesn’t even browse with JS enabled.

I do agree but I cannot say many in the demographic are on Lemmy…

This is not a strawman. I’m not misrepresenting your argument. I’m highlighting you’re being a negative fuck and there are other places for that.

Boomers don’t know what Linux is, they can barely use computers. I wouldn’t know one that would understand a meme about Linux.

Seems you’re going to be negative and double down.

Linux in a boomer meme? Wrong.

I get in some places, spouting negativity gets upvotes, but you ain’t on xitter or reddit, buddy.