… Meta’s security systems were unable to identify…

I think you mean incentivized to ignore

As far as I know, that’s pretty much stuck around. I think it’s a game where you kind of need to embrace the jank

And with the exception of the first, commonplace for a long time.

I would also argue the first use is actually a process flaw if implemented. That’s a great way to make sure no one reads emails, and all kinds of information is lost

Now we’re going to have to go north for medicine and graphics cards

Glad to know it’s not just me. I love his books, but I’ve bounced off of the show twice now

Yeah, this is the way. It’s better to let the other person do the translating, rather than presenting maybe your ideas by using a translator. It would be like running everything you post through an AI first. Best to give as much intent as possible

Fuck, I don’t want to be a keyboard pervert, but these are some good points

Soon™️

The title makes it sound like the judge put Data and the AI on the same side of the comparison. The judge was specifically saying that, unlike in the fictional Federation setting, where Data was proven to be alive, this AI is much more like the metaphorical toaster that characters like Data and Robert Picardo’s Doctor on Voyager get compared to. It is not alive, it does not create, it is just a tool that follows instructions.

The existence of intelligence, not the quality

I’d settle for reasonable ports

I don’t work in software, but networking, where I often have to work in CLI for configurations on multiple devices simultaneously. What I’ve been taught, and what’s worked for me, is drawing logical diagrams by hand with pen and paper when I’m working in a system that I think has the complexity level to get lost in. I don’t know for sure how well that will translate to software in general unfortunately.

Where that line is varies person to person, so you might only do it for those weird legacy systems. That’s usually how it is for me. This is how I best understand things in general. Laying them out physically in front of me and writing it all by hand in the format that I Intuit really helps me keep track of exactly where I’m working on what

It’s designed that way, because it has the same effect on everyone. People with ADHD are just starting with a lower capacity for it. The goal is to get as many people as possible to give up on getting what should be theirs in order to “save money”. It’s the same thing you’ll see in certain software when you try to do something they don’t like, for example, opening a link in an external browser, or contacting an actual support representative. Suddenly, this app is really poorly designed! It’s not a bug, it’s a feature

Welcome! I think you’ll find the community is a lot more pleasant when there isn’t a capitalist algorithm shoveling all the controversial idiots onto your feed!

I bet he’s not

Data preservationists are beating back the coming dark age. They’re heroes.

It looks just like the Tik Tok ban to me. Racist/Nationalist nonsense that doesn’t solve the actual underlying problem, which is lack of regulation in the US

“the single greatest insider threat risk the Bureau of the Fiscal Service has ever faced.”

https://www.wired.com/story/treasury-bfs-doge-insider-threat/

I played it back when it was free before Monster Hunter Worlds came out, and it was great then!