Your splitting hairs at this point.

My point was without SOMETHING to track clicks, you… Don’t.

Put perfectly. Had I not been on mobile…I would have written it just as lazily as I did.

Thanks for taking the time.

I’m going to educate you on what this is actually about.

You think it’s about tracking someone as they go about the web.

The article is about BLUE SKY tracking the links you click on their site. Two totally different things.

The destination logs the IP. The source doesn’t see the click, because it happens in your client, not in their site.

Source: managed tens of thousands of sites and hundreds of thousands of servers for over 25 years.

No.

You can see a link was loaded in the page. Link tracking is still needed to know if the link was clicked.

It can be an “on click” JavaScript event, or a redirect to a tracking site.

“I never consent to searches”

“I don’t answer questions. Am I detained, or am I free to leave?”

Crossover:

1 with 3

2 with 6

Not as much as you’d think.

Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran

• https://hilariouschaos.com/u/universalmonk
• https://futurology.today/u/universalmonk
• https://lemdro.id/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.radio/u/universalmonk
• https://eviltoast.org/u/universalmonk
• https://sh.itjust.works/u/universalmonk
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/swp
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/pierpontctc
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/politicsunfiltered
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/solarpunkstrength
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/fitchicks
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/lostscreams
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/libertariansocialism
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/esperanto
• https://slrpnk.net/u/universalmonk
  • https://slrpnk.net/c/solarpunkstrength
• https://mander.xyz/u/universalmonk
• https://midwest.social/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://midwest.social/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
• https://lemm.ee/u/universalmonk
  • https://lemm.ee/c/talesfromthedark
  • https://lemm.ee/c/swp
  • https://lemm.ee/c/pierpontctc
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byupathway
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemm.ee/c/politicsunfiltered
• https://beehaw.org/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
• https://lemmy.world/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/politicsunfiltered (TAKEN OVER BY ANOTHER MOD)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/PierpontCTC
  • https://lemmy.world/c/transracial
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byupathway
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemmy.world/c/swp
  • https://lemmy.world/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://lemmy.world/c/amileaday
  • https://lemmy.world/c/murderhornet_100

I watch this at least once a year!

After reviewing the actual legal filing, you’re correct. I somehow missed that.

All persons (corporate or individual) in the United States who participated in an Affiliate Program with a United States online merchant and had affiliate attribution redirected to Paypal as a result of the Honey browser extension.

Thanks for the clarification.

The YouTubers can only sue for actual damages THEY realized.

As the class is for content creators that partnered with Honey, it can only be for the affiliate links.

Users will need to sue separately, either individually or as a different class. My money is on them having a forced arbitration clause, so direct lawsuit will most likely be out of the question.

It’s a neat idea, but why not ncdu?

Absolutely brilliant idea!

Already hooked.

Yeah… Not really.

Let’s think this through. If the president has immunity, then any order he gives falls under the same immunity.

If I tell you to steal, and anything I say is legal, you stealing would fall under that umbrella. What I tell you to do can’t be legal if you doing it is illegal.