That almost flew over my head

HONK!

I have worked for non-profits.

They are completely allowed to make a profit.

You are mistakenly under the impression that I’m against Mozilla.

If you go back to my original comment, I merely explained what I explained here. Mozilla is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

You decided to take that as an attack on Mozilla, for some strange reason, and attacked me. I just turned that same energy back on you.

Did I ever attack Mozilla? Did you attack me?

I couldn’t agree more

I only use Firefox. I’ve only used Firefox since 2000.

They, by their own statements, are a 501( C )3, which is a non-profit, not a not-for-profit.

Sit down.

Non-profit isn’t the same as not-for-profit

Take American Red Cross

They make bank on blood donations. Also, they take in way more than they put out.

non-exclusive

That means we can license all our content to another company, and Reddit would be forced to allow them to fetch it, as we still own it, right?

Seriously impressed your still doing this

Your splitting hairs at this point.

My point was without SOMETHING to track clicks, you… Don’t.

Put perfectly. Had I not been on mobile…I would have written it just as lazily as I did.

Thanks for taking the time.

I’m going to educate you on what this is actually about.

You think it’s about tracking someone as they go about the web.

The article is about BLUE SKY tracking the links you click on their site. Two totally different things.

The destination logs the IP. The source doesn’t see the click, because it happens in your client, not in their site.

Source: managed tens of thousands of sites and hundreds of thousands of servers for over 25 years.

No.

You can see a link was loaded in the page. Link tracking is still needed to know if the link was clicked.

It can be an “on click” JavaScript event, or a redirect to a tracking site.

“I never consent to searches”

“I don’t answer questions. Am I detained, or am I free to leave?”

Crossover:

1 with 3

2 with 6

Not as much as you’d think.

Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran

• https://hilariouschaos.com/u/universalmonk
• https://futurology.today/u/universalmonk
• https://lemdro.id/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org/u/universalmonk
• https://lemmy.radio/u/universalmonk
• https://eviltoast.org/u/universalmonk
• https://sh.itjust.works/u/universalmonk
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/swp
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/pierpontctc
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/politicsunfiltered
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/solarpunkstrength
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/fitchicks
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/lostscreams
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/libertariansocialism
  • https://sh.itjust.works/c/esperanto
• https://slrpnk.net/u/universalmonk
  • https://slrpnk.net/c/solarpunkstrength
• https://mander.xyz/u/universalmonk
• https://midwest.social/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://midwest.social/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
• https://lemm.ee/u/universalmonk
  • https://lemm.ee/c/talesfromthedark
  • https://lemm.ee/c/swp
  • https://lemm.ee/c/pierpontctc
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byupathway
  • https://lemm.ee/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemm.ee/c/politicsunfiltered
• https://beehaw.org/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
• https://lemmy.world/u/universalmonk (BANNED)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/politicsunfiltered (TAKEN OVER BY ANOTHER MOD)
  • https://lemmy.world/c/PierpontCTC
  • https://lemmy.world/c/transracial
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byupathway
  • https://lemmy.world/c/byuidaho
  • https://lemmy.world/c/swp
  • https://lemmy.world/c/talesfromthecrypticlemmy
  • https://lemmy.world/c/amileaday
  • https://lemmy.world/c/murderhornet_100

I watch this at least once a year!

After reviewing the actual legal filing, you’re correct. I somehow missed that.

All persons (corporate or individual) in the United States who participated in an Affiliate Program with a United States online merchant and had affiliate attribution redirected to Paypal as a result of the Honey browser extension.

Thanks for the clarification.

The YouTubers can only sue for actual damages THEY realized.

As the class is for content creators that partnered with Honey, it can only be for the affiliate links.

Users will need to sue separately, either individually or as a different class. My money is on them having a forced arbitration clause, so direct lawsuit will most likely be out of the question.

It’s a neat idea, but why not ncdu?