Did… Did you read the whole link? Or just the snip the part that sounds like it supports your argument?

And yes, if you can’t do better than the wiki then you didn’t get a college education on a topic. It’s an encyclopedia, not a 4 year degree with several thousand hours of learning. And that’s when it’s working well. This article has been cut to shit by ideologues trying to revise history for their own benefit.

You thought you were going to show up here 3 weeks later and leave some kind of last word discrediting my education when I’m the one pulling the .edu links for you to look at. The fucking irony.

What drink?

Yeah, it’s not exactly the call to action he imagined.

1 percent. There’s too much they would need to do in four years to not have an election and elections are done by the states not the federal government. So there will definitely be an election. As far as getting re-elected it would take draconian measures for the exact same reason. He’d need 270 electoral votes worth of states to blatantly go against the Constitution.

The only way he remains in office past January 20th 2029 is by refusing to leave and surrounding himself with loyalists. Thus the 1 percent chance. It could work if a million things go exactly right.

Did you read his manifestos? He was a few bolts short of a bucket.

If your kids ever want to join the military you could probably just find some 2000-2010 era combat vets to talk to them. Apparently after adjusting for the systems screw up, we’re the next big recruiting problem. We told our kids not to follow us into the service.

Fun fact, the last few Indian Wars didn’t end until after World War 1.

Putting words in my mouth isn’t fixing anything. And neither is ignoring the fact that the Democrats majorly fucked up.

It is not fully unified. There are politicians who do not support Israel. In the Senate even.

But also that’s a hilarious double standard. One Republican does something and it’s all Republicans. The leader of the Democrats and the majority of their politicians do something and suddenly it’s just a symptom of the system?

Dude.

Because Biden just spent the last year of his presidency covering for and supplying a Genocide. He’s the head Democrat, so yeah. Just like the Republicans eat it when Trump does something wrong.

Well it was, now it’s Rwanda.

We aren’t though. That’s just something we’re told.

You are wrong about why. The court is lying. They are abusing their power to benefit their billionaire friends. Congress has the power to make the law, and they did make the law. The judiciary had no problem with that law for 90 years, and now suddenly it’s an issue?

deleted by creator

Is this you?

The problem is that it isn’t a law, it’s a regulation.

… it really is just another example of how various parts of the US government have been ceding or delegating their responsibilities around willy-nilly in ways that weren’t constitutionally intended…

Because that looks like blame to me, and being just plain wrong.

Except you’re blaming past congresses who absolutely operated inside their constitutional bounds. That is not the same thing because that would make any effective regulatory scheme impossible and give the courts a pass on their blatant corruption.

Some places don’t allow your first cousin. But that’s actually okay science wise. The probability for issues after the first cousin rapidly declines.

I’m saying the courts are operating in bad faith and not even trying to hide it. You can’t write your way around someone willing to declare the sky is purple if it profits their friends.

The American Gulf States and the Appalachian Region that parallels the East Coast up to about Maryland/Pennsylvania has a reputation.

To be honest, historically I could see it. It was mostly tiny towns, stuck way out in the middle of nowhere, with teenagers that had very few options. As they’ve gotten more centralized though it doesn’t happen nearly as often as it used to happen.

It could also be a look of slight surprise, like “really? That’s the excuse you’re going with?” But in context it’s definitely supposed to be sensual.