Ditto. Also insanely configurable.

Try mikrotik

podman unshare is your friend. And placing :Z at the end of bl volume share to make SELinux happy

No problem is a bit of an exaggeration, though. For starters, if your are running with a non-root user, it bites you when trying to share a host volume, specially in SELinux. I can imagine other situations when one has to fiddle with it. But yes, go with podman whenever possible.

Right, until next time they propose it again.

Can it be a BIOS/UEFI setting that disk is hot swappable? I vaguely remember similar issue on Windows. If that’s the case, try setting it as not hot swappable in BIOS/UEFI.

It’s still roughly half of the NMC. I wonder what’s the charging speed.

Yep

The price 🤯👀

It’s unlikely you will see a car powered by those in near future if ever as they have relatively low density. But you’ll definitely see those as home battery and such where size/density doesn’t matter that much. And I bet it’s less inflammable as well.

Edit: ha, I stand corrected, there are cars powered by these but don’t expect huge range.

On MacOS is UMT/Qemu.

Those were 80186? Cool, never saw one. I did some computing at school’s 8086 PC, though.

Mine too, just after Z80. Then 68000 (later plus add-on 286 board) and only after it was a pure 386.

Z80 for me, take that, ha!

SELinux doesn’t help much when it comes to desktop apps. AFAIK it’s more geared towards server apps and its configuration is complicated. At least that’s my impression.

You are right, GPG signing is good as well. But in both cases you still have unsigned apps.

What security problems do you think package managers are vulnerable to? If the upstream repo is compromised all bets are off regardless of the system.

Yep. And in such case an antivirus software might come handy.

Even package managers are vulnerable to many security problems - can they guarantee that apps are not infected either directly or indirectly (through a library)? There is also flathub. Windows have also an option to verify apps through certificates which isn’t the case with Linux AFAIK. If you want to stay safe on Windows to some degree you can, but the real problem IMO is that Windows is hugely more used and run by less technical persons. 🤷‍♂️

Security: Linux doesn’t need antivirus, just don’t install infected software. Riiiight? Sorry, but this is silly.

deleted by creator

Yeah, “smashes” by 4.3% is funny as well.