

Does it have multimonitor support?
Does it have multimonitor support?
Thanks. So zen 5 seems fine and patch for 3 and 4 will come with a newer kernel.
That’d be my assumption as well, but journalists better have to do better
Why are they mentioning only Windows?
Yeah, that scenario is not ideal by any means. As a powerplant under strict control yes, but like that - not good.
I guess the idea is to stack them up together to get required power. While at the same time they are safer and cheaper.
It could if there are issues accessing hardware directly. Overhead is, as you said, not that important.
The docker is not bare metal though.
That will also solve the mandatory restart after? I guess so. Any side effects?
My only problem with Fedora (Workstation) is that it really likes upgrade though restart. And upgrades are daily. It can’t can be turned off (to not require restart) on KDE variant, but I didn’t find an option on Gnome one.
Awesome results from sanctions. I wish EU would follow suit.
I mean the UK has 6% of its energy over the year come from solar, and 30% from wind, and installations are only accelerating, so this amount of installed solar is far from unrealistic.
Yep. No issues there. The core problem is storage here. And until we have a solid plan how to deliver with proven technology present today, we have to build new and run existing nuclear power plants. The other option is gambling.
Actually energy from fusion reactors on Earth does make a lot of sense. Sadly we are advancing slowly there.
That’s why we have all that power available, right? You guys keeping listing various technologies but it isn’t they aren’t available nowhere at scale. Even this feature is not that common among the cars of today.
And 10kWh is nowhere enough during winter (and perhaps summer with A/C), perhaps for single not big house with heat pump. Good luck with big cities.
EVs provides more than 24 hours of needed energy in an area
Only if it was fully charged, you don’t drive with it and you live in a house. And thus are not a reliable energy source at all, even less for general energy problems.
H2 technologies are advancing, including storage and pipes.
All technology is All technologies are advancing, but do you have a solution today? And even with advancements, you’ll hardly solve H2 flammability. Even keeping it contained is problematic.
Yes, something like that. Now, while you can theoretically install that many solar panels, the kicker is that you don’t have nowhere enough storage. And even if you had that 10%, you could increase solar all you want, but the nuclear would be still running at 90MW because of the storage, or better, the lack of it. And because you would have a surplus of cheap solar power energy during the day - assuming more solar panels than 10%, it would erode more expensive nuclear one to become even more expensive. Basically if we solve storage, we can get rid of nuclear, but not before.
If you trade too much EV energy during night, then you can’t drive during the day. And again, EVs capacity is not reliable at all. As per green H2, please show me a production and a storage capable of providing energy to a city. Or at least a real project that’s building it. Storing H2 is a big problem, like a huge one. If nothing else, Hindenburg tells a story. The fact that energy loss is at more than 50% when producing green H2 is a minor problem compared to storage.
And that’s your reach apparently - insulting people without anything to contribute whatsoever.
EVs are rare (in the context of total energy consumption, even more so because not so many models offer this feature), limited to houses (what do you do when you live in a flat?) and not a reliable source - “honey, I need to drive fetch some groceries, you won’t have energy in meantime”. How many houses with only EVs as energy storage are disconnected from grid? I bet the number is next to 0. OTOH EVs as energy storage can provide buffering to energy grid when properly connected. This feature has its place, but they can’t be used for reliable storage.
I assume only as long as remote is using adequate number of physical monitors? Or can one run a virtual guest with a single virtual monitor and then use as many monitors as host has?