

Eh, I haven’t boycott Ubisoft. But also, they don’t make good games so I haven’t bought any either. Might just make it official after this though.


Eh, I haven’t boycott Ubisoft. But also, they don’t make good games so I haven’t bought any either. Might just make it official after this though.


They do exist, and that can’t be undone, but those depicted in them have not consented to be used in training data. I get the ends, I just don’t think that makes the means ethically okay. And maybe the ends aren’t either, to be fair, without awaiting research on the subject, however one might do that.


Or we could like…not


AMD has had a history of some pretty stellar chips, imo. The fx series just absolutelty sucked and tarnished their reputation for a long time. My Phenom II x6, though? Whew that thing kicked ass.
What we need is either socialism or extremely strong social benefits systems
This is exactly what was implied by my previous comments. I already told you flat out that I’m for eliminating useless busy work. Why would you assume I want “people still working in the fields or mines at the scale they used to?”
Sheesh.
That doesn’t benefit the worker at all though. It is an overall detriment to the worker class as a whole.
In this case, no one is saying “less jobs bad”. They’re saying the hording of savings from job elimination is further increasing wealth disparity, shifting money from the worker class to that of the elite. It’s not like the workers’ salaries will go up or the cost of goods will go down as a result.
I’m all for eliminating useless busy work, but the rewards of that should be reaped by those doing the actual damn work. Assuming you work for some company and not for yourself, all that time you put into being more efficient and optimal does is makes your employer more money and gives you a dopamine hit for being told you’re a good boy.
it was so much time saved, compared to running around and replacing paper/stickers
It’s right there in the original comment. If it saves a significant amount of time, it reduces the overall labour burden on the workers, meaning it’s likely they will require fewer workers to complete a night’s shift (restocking, price updates, cleaning, etc.) with no real benefit to the workers considering cost savings will just be hoovered up by corporate.


Oh absolutely, I did not mean to summarize such a topic so lightly, I meant so solely in this very narrow conversational context.


That’s more of a tone thing, which is something AI is capable of modifying. Hallucination is more of a foundational issue baked directly into how these models are designed and trained and not something you can just tell it not to do.


For sure, and if this article had any more substance than him rambling, I’d agree with you.


This is an article about a sad, inept, old man’s ramblings, tangentially related to technology. Not nearly worth posting about in this community - in my opinion, of course.


I’m sure they’re happy with the reduced costs from firing half the employees, but to not consider the potential issues and actually vet the quality was such a bad decision
Kind of becomes irrelevant when the initial reduced costs were probably decimated by secondary costs they hadn’t even considered, for example, time wasted by remaining employees now burdened with correcting the AI’s mistakes.


Do you play any kernel level anti cheat games or absolutely must have desktop Office? If not, just pull the trigger. It’s so worth it.


I agree, but on the flip side this will 100% be used to train new music generation models lol…


I think they’re referring to the political article and the community within which it has been posted, not that AI isn’t technology.
That would require them to think though


And stalk women!


Dude, he just released another one where they accessed dozens of real, currently in use cameras. They didn’t even “hack” them, they just used a search engine to find publicly exposed cameras, opened their unsecured internal web panel, and could download and view any footage over the past 31 days, including from the new face tracking cameras that zoom in and pan on people’s unsuspecting faces as they walk by.
Truly wild.
I do wonder then, as new languages and tools are developed, how quickly will AI models be able to parrot information on their use, if sources like stackoverflow cease to exist.