안녕하세요!
There’s a lot of problems with Wikipedia, but in my years editing there (I’m extended protected rank), I’ve come to terms that it’s about as good as it can be.
In all but one edit war, the better sourced team came out on top. Source quality discussion is also quite good. There’s a problem with from positive/negative tone in articles, and sometimes articles get away with bad sourcing before someone can correct it, but this is about as good as any information hub can get.
Did it really though? Ruffle is a reimplantation of Flash in Rust, and is available as a browser extension. Anything short of malicious swf files will play. So it seems that any “security issues” were clearly mitigatable.
You’re overthinking it
Right, because side-loading is called “installing” on Linux
Pretty sure your workplace could have you fired if you allowed someone else access to your account
Does anyone here run Cosmic DE full time? Does it have any killer features?
The guy went homeless, where is he gonna get the funds to sue for spite
They wouldn’t win any meaningful monetary value from talking to a lawyer tbh
Reposting here explicitly because Hacker News (aka Corporate Leeches) took it down and said “It should have been clear there would be a ton of overlap or a relicensing at this point” after Hackcyom violated AGPL
But also sharing the exploits with OEMs ahead of time
It’s still around, and it still sucks: https://nuclearplayer.com/
Nah, not for suicide:
But in the post warning users that the company will call the authorities if they seem like they’re going to hurt someone, OpenAI also acknowledged that it is “currently not referring self-harm cases to law enforcement to respect people’s privacy given the uniquely private nature of ChatGPT interactions.”
Proton upstreams to Wine a lot. You can tell by the number of patches they have keeps fluctuating
How would Gopher side step this?
Distro? No. Wayland? Yes…
I read most this article and don’t see how any of it is false or misinformation. Literally the first word in the page is “alleged”, and it’s full of arguments with linked citations from both sides
Wait, how is you providing evidence to back up your argument “doing work for others”?
JK we all know the answer … 🤡
Link or gtfo, let people check the sources themselves
It was about whether Bitcoin Cash was referred to as “Bcash” or not.
I forget the semantics, but there were a lot of sources calling it Bcash, but then there were equally reliable sources saying that was only the name given by detractors. The war was something about how Bcash should be referenced in the opening paragraph