

Thoughts on the pyramids? How do you stand on the “Great Pyramids vs. Mount Rushmore” debate?
FKA
PP_BOY_/GIRL_
NotANaziIWasJustBornIn1988
Mommykink


Thoughts on the pyramids? How do you stand on the “Great Pyramids vs. Mount Rushmore” debate?


What do you mean, you never got the “women are nothing but submissive cum dumpsters” talk?


I know better than to get in any prolong discussion on Lemmy about Karl Marx but it’s worth saying that he would’ve probably been a lot more delighted with Chinese communism (educated peasant uprising) than Russian (unguided peasant revolt taken over by urban intellectual minority), although neither really fit in with his deterministic view of history which said that nations needed a period of liberal capitalism before Communism could be achieved, and he obviously predicted Western Europe would be the nexus for this change.


It’s harder to do anything up high. Construction, climate control, transportation (moving something from one end to another), managing fires, additions, evacuation of personnel in an emergency, etc. etc., all get much harder when you build up up versus across.


You’re overthinking it lol


I would love to know more about this creature


Listen to this guy OP. Don’t be like me and give yourself tinnitus by your early 20s listening to Nine Inch Nails full volume for hours on end. Aint worth it.


I understand what you’re saying (I think) but you know that… you can kill everyone, right? The worst the game does is throw a few more enemies at you (to kill) and some moral characters say mean things to you. Pretty standard RPG mechanics, IMO. It’s just a choice and like I said, the narrative framing sets you up to be a highly-trained stealthy assassin, not some mass-murdering juggernaut. But you can do that if you want
Similarly I could not use the tools the game gives me
Offers* you. There’s even an achievement for completing the game with just a sword and pistol, no upgrades or powers ;) Choices!!


IIRC you still get the low-chaos ending if you only kill the targets. It’s just by going wild and killing everyone that you get high-chaos, and I think this fits in the moral framing of the game.
I do agree with your gripe that D1 gives you a lot of fun ways to kill people and challenges you not to use them, while at the same time giving you very little nonlethal tools. They addressed this well in the sequel IMO, but I did also love the challenge and the temptation knowing that these enemies would be so easy to defeat with a rat swarm but I just shouldn’t. Like I said, keeps with the moral framing about the slippery slope of mindless revenge IMO


My poor bookshelf…


Wow that looks like a blast. I just finished my ~fifth playthrough of Bioshock: Infinite last week and that game looks like it would slot in right beside that. Thanks for sharing!


THERE ARE BOOKS!?


Dishonored (1) is my favorite game of all time. I’ve put in so many hours across every console I’ve owned since it came out in 2012. Some of the best DLC story expansions of all time, too. Glad to see it still getting some love and mourning the fact that we’ll never get another game.


PS5 still has no games. It’s an anomonly. Even after 5 years and dozens of games, the console still has no games. Wow. Truly one for the history books. I can see why Sony is already talking about releasing the PS6.


Glad to have sold my Index this past summer. Prices are gonna plummet once V.2 comes out


Eh.
It’s a limited-release phone case, essentially. This is a marketing campaign meant to go viral to reaffirm brand identity with customers, not a new product they’re putting into production. Think: “Oh Apple makes those fun pleated phone holders, they’re the fun brand, I’ll get my son’s next phone form there!” “Oh Dodge makes those super powerful muscle cars, they’re the ‘real man’s’ car brand, I’ll get my family’s next grocery-getter from there!” etc., etc.
A need for what? Fucking pockets? That’s been well and truly addressed for hundreds if not thousands of years already.
Can never have enough pockets. I don’t know about you, but I also hate putting my phone in my pants pocket. Kind of like how modern cars still don’t have a real solution to phone storage, most modern clothes still don’t have a good way to store $1,000 electronic devices that for most people carry their whole identity. It’s neat, it’s novel. Anyone who follows any kind of fashion should recognize Issey Miyake and understand that Apple at least did things right and hired a real celebrated human designer for this.
This is 200% that.
Maybe in a long way if you consider that Apple invented the first smartphone fifteen years ago (which they didn’t), but like I said, this actually tries to solve the problem of carrying an expensive smart device that I personally have experienced for years.
tl;dr: if this was just called the ISSEY MIYAKE Phone Carrier, 99% of ya’ll would look at it for ten seconds, call it a silly, overpriced novel designer accessory that’s been around forever and go about your day without getting all eschatological about it.


Silly? Stupid? Sure, but also not at all compulsory and it seems to address a need in the market versus Apple’s usual “inventing problems” approach


It just saves us all time tbh
In Nashville once while being ridden to a Geese concert, an Uber driver told me that Egyptian girls are hot and easy but “militaristically anti-processed meat.” Thoughts?