

Odd … stepcattle doesn’t sound at all like the sort of thing involving jackboots and train cars.
Unemployed journalist, burner, raver, graphic artist and vandweller.
Odd … stepcattle doesn’t sound at all like the sort of thing involving jackboots and train cars.
At this point, using NoScript is muscle memory. No reason to add friction to a process, even if it may not be the most efficient method in terms of memory usage.
I first gave NoScript a spin sometime in the mid-2010s. It was an adjustment, to say the least. But once you get used to temporarily allowing a new target domain as a matter of course, holy hell does the whole game come into specific relief.
The Washington Post, for example – which I was a paid subscriber to until it shit the bed – wanted JS from some 25 domains (many of which were Amazon ad related). I also have NoScript on Firefox on my Pixel.
Firefox, uBO and NoScript are the floor for passable internet hygiene to me.
And people worry about LLMs taking over competent work. Thanks for your hard work, congrats on the kid, and take the time you need.
I mean, if you’re still using Chrome, you likely don’t know about Manifest v3. Those who do have been on FF for quite some time.