Oh, we’re back at “UNGA BUNGA VIRTUAL NUMBER BIG” shit again. Wow, you’re really making those 2 braincels work really hard, and nothing else is coming out, huh…

I mean, it tracks, since your idol is a dumbass nazi oligarch, whose only chance of not being sentenced for fraud was getting into the government.

Done wasting my time here, is like haveing a discussion eith a breezeblock

Your fragile “reality” is based on the covers of Forbes, where one day you’re “most successful investor” and the next day you’re sentenced for 25 years in jail for fraud.

So the latter, huh.

My man here takes a minute to think and comes up with “BUT… BUT VIRTUAL NUMBER BIG” contra argument… Again.

Yes, you are.

You willingly ignore any argument in favour of “BUT VIRTUAL NUMBER BIG”.

That’s either being brainwashed or pure stupidity.

As “successful” as Elisabeth Holmes. She had “objectively the best performance than every other rich woman!”.

Honestly, you kids have your brains fried by these scam-artists. Your measure of “success” is so, so sad and pathetic.

Yeah, whn you shot-gun spray your investments, you’re bound to get lucky.

What about:

• Solar roof tiles
• Dumbass tunel
• Morons’ train in a tube
• Scam roadster and scam truck
• X as everything app nonsense

When you’re born into financial security, you can try dumb shit, and you’re bound to get lucky.

If you’re born into financial security and you’re a grifter/scammer - you’re bound to become a billionaire.

Sounds like a load of techbro nonsense.

By that logic mirroring an image would suffice to count as derivative work since it’s “kinda sorta similar”. It’s not the original, and 0% of pixels match the source.

“And the machine, it learned to flip the image by itself! Like a human!”

It’s a predictive keyboard on steroids, let’s not pretent that it can create anything but noise with no input.

I don’t think it’s possible to amass “millions” as an executive, while giving fair payments to everyone down the chain.

You are comparing guerilla partisan resistance (from evil) with something that’s being resisted against (evil) and saying they both represent violence.

I think that’s not correct.

Some people that turn to violence in order to protect the weak are (treated as) heros.

A person can be an idol/totem/icon of resistance. The post does not incite violence, nor does it display any violence. It does not break any rules.

Pixar-style animation needs to die already. It’s like Corporate Memphis at this point.

slow clap

Fair point.

“Like human”
Yes, like a very, very robotic, unnatural human.
Almost like a robot.

Good. If you still work for Meta, you’re either a garbage prson, a bootlicker or a techbro.

Get stepped on, and not in a kinky way.

My god, you call yourselves “nerds”, while you’re absolutely baffled when someone knows more about some specific niche of a niche.

Echo-chamber for fanboys.

There are many communities oriented specifically around privacy and Windows.

Apparently nothing, since one of the aggressively incorrect Linux fanboys has told me it’s impossible. Unless…

Lmao, that’s not what “factually correct” means.

Edit: I’m not defending Windows. I’m just annoyed by annoying people spreading misinformation and assuming that just because they’re not capable of achieving something - nobody is. Lack of knowledge and dumbassery.

Weird hill? You quoted my comment trying to gotcha me, then painting yourself into a corner and essentially walking back on your “argument”.

My original comment stands, there’s nothing Linux can offer me that Windows already doesn’t. That includes “Privacy” as I am in control over that with my setup and Windows. I do not care what you ‘think’ about it, I KNOW that.

Why are you having an aneurism over this, why is it so difficult to grasp this simple concept?

From “absolutely cannot” to “unless” in one comment. That was fast.