

Why would you make this comment? Did you think it added to the discussion?


Why would you make this comment? Did you think it added to the discussion?


The admins over there have some profoundly questionable views, which tends to push away reasonable people and attract bootlickers.
Such as?
Lots of fairly wild accusations being made throughout this thread that I’d love to read up on to avoid the “just trust me bro” axiom.


Slightly useful to you, extremely harmful for everyone else?
=
Sorry, no can do.


White hat hackers need to exploit these kernel-level anti-cheats enough to make it so the cheaper option is to implement that exact infrastructure.


Yum, a circlejerk!


Nobody bothered to make federal agents wearing masks illegal, and eventually they decided to do it.


y do u mak ur txt hrd 2 reed


As always: laws apply to the poor, not the rich.


Conservative ideology is essentially:
Just leave everything the way they were when I was born, regardless of whether or not improvements can be made.


Do you think that every or most roads have the wrong speed limit? I sure don’t.


That I understand, but as the person I replied to said that I hope you read, people intentionally go 50 in the 45.
So the grace window you mention is irrelevant; you’d be doing 51 in the 45.


But then why don’t we all shoplift packs of gum every week?
Speeding is the one law everyone agrees is fun and acceptable to break a bit, despite being more dangerous than many actual crimes.


So dumb that society collectively agreed that 35 means 40, 40 means 45, 45 means 50, etc.


Now the whole point is advertising.


You joke but people who live porn still watch porn.


Ostensibly, yes. Just like the Patriot Act was to fight terrorism.


Only had to be an open scam for decades before they decided to do anything about it.


I don’t understand much about Catholicism but I do know they cream their pants for “saints.”
I would just link people to the Megathread:
https://sh.itjust.works/post/37226752