Im a bit too hammered to understand it right now, but I think the math is hidden in here with very ambiguous wording.

In a note released Thursday, Morgan Stanley projected that Amazon’s plan could cut around 13,834 managerial roles by early next year, saving the company between $2.1 billion and $3.6 billion. The estimate is based on the assumption that managers make up 7% of Amazon’s workforce.

The freshest Akira variant uses old-timey encryption method vulnerable to brute-force methods

It breaks old-timey encryption.

There’s a butterfly meme to make here, not sure if it should be aimed at the scammer or the reposts

Doesn’t really matter. The important bit is he has no idea either. (It’s likely the former and he’s blaming the weirdos trying to get in)

The c/reddit community is not for people who love reddit. Having reddit in your name doesn’t mean you like or support reddit. There’s no irony, youre just misunderstanding my username, the sub and just about everything else. Stop trying to make fun of people’s usernames.

What I should have said was “reminder: nobody give a shit about going back to reddit” for the slow one’s in the back looking to take things personally.

Talk about the post instead of attacking people directly. I can have whatever in my name and say “nobody cares you can still access reddit”, it doesn’t matter how you interpret my username. Reddit was once something else.

It’s okay you’ll never get it. Go back to feeding money to spez now

This is a community about reddit discussion/news. Most posts are about how they censor, monetize and essentially wage war with their communities #luigi. I don’t need “reminders” to go back.

They circumvent reddit ads by paying reddit directly for the API (using their own ads). It still funds reddit.

Reminder: nobody gives a shit about reddit

How do you figure that?

They run ads and subscriptions to afford the API, which is paid to spez.

This is a much better answer than the current top post.

US military spending is nearly double that of all other NATO members combined Estimated defence expenditure of NATO members in 2024, at current prices and exchange rates

I like how they always show that the US spends double the amount of all the other nations combined. What they forget is that nobody asked the US to overspend, they do that to get 100x the influence. The US has around 750 military bases around the world, often remnants from post WW2 agreements of surveillance or security. The next country on the list is Russia, with about a dozen. Watch Trump threaten to Nuke everyone when they lose those sweet economic incentives for the industrial military complex.

This isn’t about spending, it’s a about Putin.

Your tongue is also super tactile. We spend most of our toddler years discovering this.

You can look at anything around you, anything, and your brain knows exactly what it would be like to lick it, even if you’ve never done it before. Taste, texture, residue etc… it’s quite freaky

Oh and my thighs are really good at imagining my phone just buzzed.

That’s the only difference between a dictatorship and a democracy. A dictatorship can run with dying illiterate slaves and still make a lot of money (see Elons Dad’s small loan of one emerald mine). In a democracy the money comes from the productivity of the citizens. That’s the only reason you get highways, schools, hospitals…

So they started out by making us more productive by giving a ton of amenities to the boomers. But now they need more, so they are cutting back on things that make us productive, while demanding we be more productive.

We should just eat the rich.

Apple stopped providing encrypted storage, but they didnt unencrypt the existing storage for governments to see.

Statham wasn’t the worst actor in that movie, and I hated the dumb cops and “political stakes” way more than the beekeeper plot. Also Statham can still move without 57 jump cuts.

C+ tier plane movie.

My comment does not say jury nullification shouldn’t exist/be allowed. It says the opposite.

Unpopular take but despite it being a popular thing, we want jury nullification to come from individual conclusions that this law does not apply despite the circumstances, and not because they know they can. Every study ever has shown that people who know about jury nullification tend to dismiss evidence more often, and are more easily deceived by a sympathetic/ non-sympathetic looking defendant. It’s not even a law, it’s the result of the fact juries can’t be prosecuted for their decisions so really they can do whatever they want. This is enough to know that technically you can “nullify the law”. That goes both ways, people can convict without evidence

Saying the law doesn’t actually apply despite the person having done the thing the law says not to do is very different from saying the punishment should be nil. This could also keep you from ever serving on a jury and telling others about this in certain circumstances could be a crime. All the legal minds who looked into this agree it should still remain a thing, but it shouldn’t be told to jurors explicitly. When you serve you swear to uphold the law, so it’s tricky to nullify without purgery perjury except for very very special cases.

This is not a good YSK, you should understand what the law is as a juror. You could in theory reword this entire post without actually using the term and that would probably be helpful, but super complicated to write.

Esit: I’m team Luigi (in mario kart of course)

Not just him, but they found his wife and dog dead too.

A mix of cognitive bias and systemic racism

But also stereotypes exists and can be true to some degree, often just cultural