That’s the only difference between a dictatorship and a democracy. A dictatorship can run with dying illiterate slaves and still make a lot of money (see Elons Dad’s small loan of one emerald mine). In a democracy the money comes from the productivity of the citizens. That’s the only reason you get highways, schools, hospitals…

So they started out by making us more productive by giving a ton of amenities to the boomers. But now they need more, so they are cutting back on things that make us productive, while demanding we be more productive.

We should just eat the rich.

Apple stopped providing encrypted storage, but they didnt unencrypt the existing storage for governments to see.

Statham wasn’t the worst actor in that movie, and I hated the dumb cops and “political stakes” way more than the beekeeper plot. Also Statham can still move without 57 jump cuts.

C+ tier plane movie.

My comment does not say jury nullification shouldn’t exist/be allowed. It says the opposite.

Unpopular take but despite it being a popular thing, we want jury nullification to come from individual conclusions that this law does not apply despite the circumstances, and not because they know they can. Every study ever has shown that people who know about jury nullification tend to dismiss evidence more often, and are more easily deceived by a sympathetic/ non-sympathetic looking defendant. It’s not even a law, it’s the result of the fact juries can’t be prosecuted for their decisions so really they can do whatever they want. This is enough to know that technically you can “nullify the law”. That goes both ways, people can convict without evidence

Saying the law doesn’t actually apply despite the person having done the thing the law says not to do is very different from saying the punishment should be nil. This could also keep you from ever serving on a jury and telling others about this in certain circumstances could be a crime. All the legal minds who looked into this agree it should still remain a thing, but it shouldn’t be told to jurors explicitly. When you serve you swear to uphold the law, so it’s tricky to nullify without purgery perjury except for very very special cases.

This is not a good YSK, you should understand what the law is as a juror. You could in theory reword this entire post without actually using the term and that would probably be helpful, but super complicated to write.

Esit: I’m team Luigi (in mario kart of course)

Not just him, but they found his wife and dog dead too.

A mix of cognitive bias and systemic racism

But also stereotypes exists and can be true to some degree, often just cultural

I think leaving gulf of mexico is ok

Im very lucky i know french, it helps a lot more than English

Try to find some that are made properly.

Because

1- they were always like this but had advisors and people to speak for them 2- it’s now cool to be a fucking racist, so if you want to be in the Trump club you better get your racism on (see zuck). It’s very very lucrative right now to go along with it and you might be illegally shut down / removed if you dont.

Insecurity. “Males” is a pretty wide brush in this case

Why am i not surprised to immediately find garbage like “genocide Joe” in your post history.

You couldn’t even formulate an argument. Thanks for making it obvious why to block

He wasn’t just a joke, musk was legally forced to make his deal real to avoid having manipulated the market and potentially go to prison. This was before he became POTUS . If it happened today he would just tell the courts to fuck off and replace those who aren’t loyal without ever actually buying twitter

Twitter was never profitable until data was worth enough and even then…

Musk tried to pump and dump the stock by saying it was worth much more than it was. Then he immediately got sued because if you manipulate the market like that and have the cash to pay, you have to or it’s considered a crime. Musk then tried to back out, shareholders threaten to sue, and he pretended he actually didnt wanna back out and bought it.

He purchased it at twice its market value and has since not only cut 80% of staff, but also lost 80% of its original value (not the double musk paid)…

Twitter only had value to musk because he wanted to use it as a disinformation tool to help SA/Russia/China. He immediately made it a right wing platform where this content is more valuable. It was a dumb decision, still has a dumb business plan and a fuckton of debts. The only reason it didn’t disappear completely is Musk is too rich, but it’s trending down. It’s projected to grow as the US becomes an oligarchy but not because it has real value. Musk wants to turn it into Facebook+ Cash app

Buying twitter was all in all a terrible business move and mostly to stroke elons ego. Sadly this is “too big to fail” territory

Using their logic against them never works.

Theyre just the same words chained together in most cases. So “my favorite food” becomes "my favoritefood. Once you get the general vocabulary the longer words aren’t too jarring

I’d argue German is harder for genders (there are 3 with neutral). It’s nice that german at least pronouncs every letter in the word

There are independent apps for that where you can link all your accounts.

Others have pointed out the app is for identification which makes sense to have an app to secure the exchange, but a lot of them don’t request identification in most cases.

While 2FA is normal, there are multiple ways to 2FA. I’ve never heard of having to install their own proprietary app on a phone just to use an authenticator token.