Definitely feels like both 1 & 2.

Oh Christ, it’s just another AI for reviewing AI “authored” code? We’re fucking cooked

This seems like a possibly good move to help make GOG concentrate on being even more G. Hard to see any likely downsides. Seems like a natural step in the maturity of both GOG and CDPR. Hopefully other investors see this the same way.

Well, you’ve got another think coming.

It’s JavaScript

Oddly enough, following the link from the HackerNews post allowed me to read the entire article, which was moving.

Paywall.

Because you’re nothing to them

Same, and now I have two cats on me. Winning

The only time I’ve ever done that is during an upgrade chain that results in a motherboard not fitting into the case I need it to. Even then, the last one I bought was from a local used parts shop since I had an Intel 4670k I wanted to slap into a server.

The game was released with AI assets. The rules required disclosure, and they failed to properly disclose. Whether this was on purpose or by accident, they were disqualified quite fairly. It’s a shame, but fairness must apply equally to all studios.

Time to ban books

Wands don’t kill people, wizards kill people

This sounds like it could actually really help people. Something’s off. What’s the catch? Do they harvest the orphans’ organs on their 25th birthday?

Sure wish they mentioned the effeciency.

Nice try, clanker lover

I miss Microcenter

Apparently only one other person in these comments actually read the article. They failed to disclose that the game was released with AI assets. Whether this action was purposeful or not, their submission was disqualified according to the rules. That’s really all there is to it.

I think it’s stupid.