It comes down to two fundamental conceptions of what the Fediverse should be.

One is a single account, all access, everything does anything any other thing does, kind of vision.

The other is a, we do our thing, you do yours, we can do together where appropriate, kind of vision.

I fall into the later. I have no problem with multiple accounts for different kinds of content and entertainment. You may fall closer to the former.

You say that’s not a thing; That there’s only one liberal.
Then you break down two different camps of liberals?

You see how that might be confused, right?

It’s almost like different people use liberal to mean different things, which can lead them to talk past each other.

I think you’re using a different kind of Liberal here.
You sound like econonic liberal, while OP sounds like social liberal.

It’s actually Fast X part 2. And as I recall Vin Deisel said this is actually the end.

Maybe the studio will do a reboot or prequel at some point. But this is it for a while.

Go to his barbeques. Invite him to yours.
Throw him a suprised birthday party.
Invite him to his favorite sportsball competition.
Become his best friend.
Talk to him about every aspect if his life and work.
Record every conversation.
Send anything useful to a news reporter, or prosecutor.

Oooh…
That was unclear. It sounded like you were talking about posting.

Why put the summary in the comments instead of the post text?

Social media is standing up on a podium in a crowded street, shouting through a bullhorn. Now you’re asking about comming back the next day to tell everyone what you said yesterday is a secret. Do you see how that seems strange?

Privacy lost, can NEVER be regained. When you make something public, that’s it. It’s public now.

Never post anything to any social media that you might want to keep private. It doesn’t matter who owns it, or how it’s licensed, if it’s online unencrypted, it’s public; Now and evermore.

It’s not “damage”
At best it’s “potentially missed revenue”

But by calling it dammage, it sounds inherently like a crime that needs to be prevented. As if someone broke an accountants favorite pen or calculator. They’ll have to spend additional money to replace the damaged item, actually costing them something. That helps them get law makers and enforcement on their side.

But potentially missed revenue sounds very different. That sounds like they have some marketing research to do, in trying to sell their product. Which is difficult to get sympathy for.

No wonder they chose the word “damage”. And the news media goes with it, because they have a similar interest. Their also trying to make money selling raw intellectual property.

This video from Barry’s Economics is a fantastic explanation of exactly what you’re asking.

The whole channel is probably of interest to you.

But in short, yes. What we currently have in the US is a mutated bastardization of capitalism. The wealthy have spent the last ~50 years bending capitalism tward something like a kind of neo-feudalism.

To your second question:
Anyone who thinks one system is going to be the best at everything is just silly. Some markets are best served by capitalism. Others would be socialist. A few critial markets would likely be best served by more communist style, direct government monopoly. Mixing, matching, and even switching systems as markets grow and evolve will be vital in the future.

Not a song

Not generally.
I don’t keep speeches prepared on topics. I just say what I think at the moment, when I run across an interesting prompt.

Market socialism is what I basically said was necessary at any substantial scale.
I don’t know what you’re actual question is. You need to be more specific.

Of course they have markets. Any society that grows much larger than where everyone can personally know everyone else, will need some form of money. The options are eithor barter directly, or use some form money as a medium of exchange and accounting. Barter can work in groups up to several hundred at least, maybe even a couple thousand. But beyond that, some form of money will naturally emerge.

People go to multiple social events in a day?
Or are you talking about a week?

Meditation is all about the trying. “Sucess” is in the attempt itself.

When your mind wanders, don’t worry that it wandered. It inevitable will. You can’t really stop that. What you can do is notice when it’s happening. Then pay attention to the wandering. Why did that thought pop up? Now that I noticed it where does it go. It’s like watching what the bus driver does instead of just letting the scenery absorb your attention as it passes by. Or it’s like thinking about how a movie was made instead of letting yourself get swept up in the narrative.

Don’t stress meditation. Half the point is to just chill.

Which tax advantaged account doesn’t matter to growth or liquidity.
For growth, what matters is what you’re holding in the accounts.
And you can’t take any of it out until retirement, so viscosity doesn’t even matter much.

Beyond that answering your question would require knowing the current distribution.

In short I think you’re confidently looking at this the wrong way and need to talk to a professional to get things straightened out.

Sure, but that is the line in the song.

Could go all KFC and just make the full offical name be “USA”.

I’d like something original. Something that captures the spirit of the country. Something like “Glorificia” maybe.
“♫ I’m proud to be a Glorifican! Where at least I know I’m freeee ♫”

Pinterest is their own publicly traded company.
They aren’t owned by Meta.

I found Pinry and Pinetta. Though they seem to be kinda defunct without much recent activity.

Pixelfed allows you to make collections of posts, kinda like Pinterest.

That’s all I found with a simple search.