Wikipedia is backed by nothing but donations, and the youtube video is sponsored by the stock market. If anything, wikipedia is backed by the engines of socialism.
Did you do any research beyond watching this youtube video? Because everyone else’s research seems to discredit it.
But if I compare a free and unbiased knowledge resource asking for a one-time donation and a YouTube channel backed by the engines of capitalism, which one am I going to trust?
Even if Wikipedia doesn’t need the money, they deserve it.
How much money do you give to online creators so they can do stupid shit? Surely you can give at least a fraction of that to the biggest free knowledge source in the world.
I’m willing to trust it more than a guy with a stock broker sponsor.
After searching on a very unhelpful website, it looks like it goes from $5 to $43. And the trip could take several hours, depending on how far you’re going. So it’s not a commute thing, more like a tourism thing.
I never really thought about the price of AI. I was too distracted by literally everything else about AI being terrible to consider that they’d want money for it.
A butthole is a fitting image for something that produces nothing but shit.
This is entirely the wrong community for what you’re trying to do.
Which country? It seems to all be there. It might be cut in half or upside down, but it’s all there.
He can’t post to that community anyway. He got instance banned.
I understood you. It just sounds horrible. Sorry, no, it’s actually worse. Side stories are part of the story, so it goes without saying they should have the same designers as the rest of the story. If you think they don’t count, that’s worrying.
That sounds horrible, personally. The world, story and characters should all reflect one another, so they should all be designed by the same people. Using AI to cheap out on the story is how you get rubbish stories.
Yes you can. There might be consequences, but that will always be the case. If obeying orders breaks the law, and disobeying orders breaks the law, then you’re a criminal either way. Might as well do what you agreed to do when you joined the military: risk your life to defend the constitution.
If the law disagrees, the law is wrong and should be broken. And if that leads to a punishment, just remember that someone is being ordered to punish you, and they can defy those orders too.
So it’s two steps backwards from Lemmy?
Who says “very frightened”? They just say “terrified”, which is surprisingly NOT what the infographic recommends! And “very perfect” is just nonsense. So is “very well-to-do”, which feels like they worked backwards instead of figuring out what “very wealthy” would be.
These guys need to proofread their own work, I guess.
You broke the rules with a bait post. You got told off. You then posted this TWELVE times in unrelated communities hoping for support. Each one has a mass of downvotes. Stop trying to play the victim and just take the damn L.
It was very funny to see them say that, then say “no assholes” with a straight face.
I learned this from the paw patrol copaganda video on youtube, which does site sources, so you can go from there.
A man speaks to his wife as a husband, his child as a father, his employee as a boss and a drinking buddy as a friend. None of these are the entirety of the man, nor are they false personas. They are many sides of the same man.
Are you eccentric or accommodating? From the sounds of it, I think you’re both.