• 14 Posts
  • 1.07K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • I mean, it has enabled every goober and bad actor with an opinion to essentially have a megaphone and build platforms and movements. I’d argue that’s a net negative. Even the Fediverse isn’t immune to propaganda and conspiracy theories.

    I think putting a warning on the tin is appropriate, especially for platforms run by billionaires whose explicit goal is to get people hooked and keep them feeding the machine by any means necessary.

    It’s true that the bulk of the issue arises from the people in charge of the platforms, but nobody currently in power is going to do anything about the billionaire problem. This is at least a vague gesture acknowledging that a problem exists. Also, it’s just a sign. When have warning signs stopped people from doing things that are unhealthy?












  • I appreciate your cynicism, but I’m not personally inclined towards it. I think what it will ultimately boil down to, which you alluded to, is how the law is enforced. If they get fined as a first measure but then get taken to court for a second failure by California’s attorney general and get subsequently bankrupted, it might stand as an example to others.

    Or maybe they’ll still say the potential risk is still worth it. I dunno. We’ll just have to see how this goes, but it’s still better than the current options, which are:

    • Trying to navigate deleting your own data, staying on top of it, and hoping they’re actually deleting things.
    • Paying a private company to do it and hope they’re not just pocketing your money.
    • Doing nothing and getting butt-fucked by surveillance capitalism.

    None of those are great, so I’m hopeful this is the start of something better.


  • Am I wrong for wanting to seek some electoral power to at least have a leader in my country that’s NOT a raging transphobe, or neo Nazi?

    Nope, but it might not mean you’re an anarchist. I stress the word “might.”

    Anarchy is a philosophy, not a destination, as you kind of alluded to. I plan to vote in the coming elections and continue to participate in electoral politics, because I recognize that this system will not be replaced simply by non-participation. There are not yet enough anarchists to just overturn what has been the norm for a long time.

    That does not mean, however, that I will be satisfied with this system. It’s going to continue to take years of effort to wrest power from the hands of the undeserving. I may never see the kind of governance I think will work at scale, but if I can be part of making that become people’s reality someday, then I will have done my part.

    It sounds like you’re coming around to communalism, which is the kind of anarchy I like. It’s also the most viable path, imo, to see anarchy become a reality, because helping each other at a small scale was always the point for me.

    Big governments don’t work—even when they’re good—because they are unable to effectively respond to the immediate needs of a growing and changing populace. They can catch many disabled people in a broad net, for example, and provide help, but the minute somebody doesn’t fit the mould, they fall through the cracks or get left behind entirely. A community, though? They know you, what you need, and they are already there with you to help.

    I think it’s good that you’re asking questions. Keep it up! Don’t be satisfied with “good enough.”