Em Adespoton

Bards. There were bards.

It’s the answer that came to my mind when I saw the question. I was not disappointed to see someone had already written it 😃

Depends on your local laws. If there are no municipal or regional laws against it and the zoning allows for it, yes, you could do it.

You could also form a corporation that is owned by a lot of people and use that to buy a regular plot of land, and that would usually comply with local regulations. That’s how strata corporations work.

On the other side of this, I once had a co-worker who bought a keystroke recorder and attached it to his own computer.

The person who had been messing with his computer saw the mini camera he had set up but missed the keylogger. He was able to figure out who it was and what they were up to from that.

Why over 11?

In the time it takes for all this to play out, all the farmers could recoup their potential losses and then some by replacing their JD investment with Kubota, who supports independent repair shops.

Of course, with the debt load most farmers carry, that’s easier said than done.

If the federal government set up a replacement program though, and shipped all the JD machinery to Ukraine where hackers know how to modify the software, everyone but JD would win.

Horses, because they used to be everywhere. Step in the street, and you were likely to step in some.

Bull, because it’s very big and smelly and there was usually some around (steer manure is still prized for gardening).

Bats… because it rains from above and is really gross, and you’ve got a high likelihood of getting really sick from it.

Why we don’t go on about pigeon and seagull guano though? I have no idea.

The difference is that black market gambling is distributed. It means that there are fewer protections for people who engage in it but more people profiting from it.

But legalization just means most of the action is controlled by a handful of corporations, and the government is involved in protecting the flow of money, of which they get a cut.

Why limited to young men in new york?

That’s like saying that submerging a young man’s head in water for over five minutes could lead to death.

“Peak” is rather optimistic….

Usually in the US they call it a co-op instead of a commune, but yeah, things like that are already done.

Most people have taste receptors in their gut as well as on their tongue. It helps regulate how quickly your muscles contract to move stuff along through your intestine.

Some people don’t have as many, and some people build up a tolerance to capsaicin (in both their mouth and gut).

Dump it out and use it like any other popcorn. It’s pre-salted and the bag contains the oil you’d otherwise need to add.

But don’t put it in an air popper; the oil is likely to catch fire or just cause the kernels to burn.

I’d be more likely to just assume delivery quality was going downhill and look for another streaming video hoster/provider. Why would someone link slow speeds to a plugin that filters out the stuff you don’t want?

Currently blocking ads consists of keeping uBlock Origin up to date. Not blocking ads generally means going to a different platform after a single ad roll.

I have no issues with pre-roll ads; it’s the interstitial ones that drive me away.

If they know I’m blocking their ads, why wouldn’t they just block the video altogether? That’s what they currently do.

If it’s already blocked, slowing it down to “blocked… but slower” seems rather pointless?

https://www.kleankanteen.com/

Been using them for 15 years; the bottles get a few dents in them, but I’ve even been able to hammer most of those out.

Haven’t used a plastic water bottle since the early 90s.

The one I use is part of a hardware UTM, but I also use Lockdown VPN on iOS, and https://pi-hole.net/ in a container on my LAN, and then VPN all my devices to my home network when I’m not at home.

Depends on the browser/OS.

My go-to for general browsing is Firefox with uBlock Origin and NoScript, which I also use in Edge; I have a few browsers that are still using uMatrix, and I have a proxy filter that strips calls to .js URLs by default except for specifically allowed URLs.

This is why using a local web proxy is a good idea; it can standardize those responses (or randomize them) no matter what you’re actually using.

Personally, I keep JavaScript disabled by default specifically because of this, and turn on those features per-site. So if a website has a script that requires the accelerometer for what it does, that script gets to use it. Other sites keep asking for it? I suppress the requests on that site and if it fails to operate (throws one of those ad blocker or “you have JS disabled errors), I just stop going to the site.

I’ve found that with everything disabled by default, browsing the web is generally a pleasant experience… until it isn’t.

This of course requires using a JS management extension. What I’d really like to see is a browser that defaults to everything disabled, and if a site requests something, have the browser ask for permission to turn on the feature for that particular script, showing the URL for the script and describing what the code does that needs the permission. This seems like an obvious use for locally run AI models.