• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2024

help-circle
  • There should be efforts to duplicate the results in an ethical way, the lack of rigorous ethics indicates biases. If you tortured a guy for research, did you also do less bad things like falsify results?

    The Stanford prison experiment is a good example, afaik they published in several journals and I don’t believe any of them have printed retractions. There are huge problems with the methodology that are still being discussed, and the results are still being referenced.








  • It eludes to criminal culpability, but doesn’t point out who would actually be charged, or with what crime, or what authority would be persecuting. You’re using ambiguity to further your narrative.

    Maybe get your ducks in a row on some facts, and then you’ll actually be able to hold warmongers accountable.

    Spouting nonsense about criminality does nothing for the innocent dead, and does nothing to prevent deaths by these people.

    Look at some statistics about incarceration in the US. Personal possession of plants has people in jail. There’s absolutely a difference between crimes and morals, you aren’t going to get justice conflating them.