If you’ve been living under a rock since the 80s, let me bring you up to speed. You don’t buy software, you buy a license to use software, including games. This is the whole reason why free/libre software exists. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
All ambitious games have problems on launch. If the studio is any good, these usually get cleaned up over the following six months or so. I’ve played over 100 hours. Game is fun.
He’s just dangling it out there so one of the competitors buys his “business”. He doesn’t actually want to make anything. It’s another grift in disguise.
If it runs without human supervision, it’ll be a gong show.
If you read the commentary on the process you notice heavy reliance on experts in the field to ensure the code is good and secure. Claude is great at pumping out code, but it can really get confused and forget/omit earlier work, for example.
I think the notion of junior developers disappearing because of AI is false. These tools accelerate productivity, they don’t replace human experience.
Thank you, that’s 90% of the way there. 😁
I’d give my left nut to have a GUI for managing the icons in the GNOME dock. Like, where is the binary for this icon? Can I edit this .desktop file from the right click menu, please? FML.
This article sucks and didn’t actually explain why upstart failed.
Saying it failed because it was unpopular is idiotic. Why was it unpopular? What did other distro maintainers say about the canonical license? Why was Red Hat working on a separate solution instead of upstart? Why did upstart not provide additional features like systemd did? What made canonical pull the plug? There are so many questions and no answers to explain upstart’s failure.
This may be good for adding accessibility options to players who need them.
The airlines measuring things in feet gets under my skin so hard. >:(