Probably undoing whatever it was they did on Monday (and badly patched in the meantime)
Probably undoing whatever it was they did on Monday (and badly patched in the meantime)


Windows team is desperate to remain relevant.
I suspect most Microsoft revenue these days comes from Azure and the cloud version of Office. Windows OS is pretty much irrelevant other than as a platform to distribute other products.


If anyone is in doubt - this is clearly satire


she suggests that every board meeting should include an AI bot – and perhaps, in the not-so-distant future, replace the entire board with bots altogether
She’s got a point though


There’s a lot of people out there whose goal is to feel morally superior, rather than change the world in any way.
They tend to congregate at the extremes both left and right. Anywhere when they can loudly judge and exclude others.


He’s more of a “High Priest of Antichrist” type. He’d fit perfectly as a season villain in Buffy.


Investors be investering.
No understanding about building a business. Companies just magically appear as fully developed and profitable, then you milk them for short term returns.


The typical recommendation in this case is Debian.
I don’t know how hard it is to install since I don’t use it myself. There are a lot of people swearing by it’s stability, even running it for 10+ years on the same hardware without a reinstall.


Google replicated the mental state if not necessarily the productivity of a software developer


Salesman gonna sell.
Altman is quite good at it actually. Remember when he was saying how scared he was of his own AI. Or calling for increased regulation because their models are just sooo good that government has to nerf them.


They believe that they are a special breed of human being, the “new patriots” who are willing to take risks to restore America’s position in a place of global dominance
All of their actions taken so far lead to a catastrophic failure of the stated goal. Either they’re not honest, or they’re stupid.


Does anyone else think that LLMs have been regressing in the last 2 years. At least in the area of deep questions. Initially you could push the limits and actually bounce crazy ideas off of them and get some creative results.
Now they basically they always give you a canned answer that sounds like it was pre-approved by a committee.
They are not members of the party called the Conservative Party. It doesn’t stop them from being conservatives ideologically.


The article is very unclear on the kind of model they used. Several mentions of ChatGPT, but it doesn’t really sound like they used an LLM.
I really hope it’s not an LLM, this is a perfect case for specialized models trained just for surgery. I really wouldn’t want my surgeon to invent stuff when it doesn’t know what to do.


Good, keep convincing them that copyright is woke. And we don’t want anything woke right, wink wink


Humans suffer from the same problem. Racism and sexism are consequences of humans training on a flawed dataset, and overfitting the model.


Outsourcing your Defense Department to a foreign country is a choice. Not a smart choice, but a choice nonetheless.


It means max 220k, the big number is there to give false hope.
The difference between being technically right and knowing how to communicate.
There’s like a 100 different ways to reject a PR without referring to a contributor as a moron.
I think lately Linus learned how to do it correctly without going on rants.
Don’t you know, God is a lazy slob who needs to be provoked into action. And of course he has no idea what’s happening on Earth unless someone tells him in a very specific way.